User talk:Leerobotham

March 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Boxing ‎ worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lee Robotham


A tag has been placed on Lee Robotham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Stephenb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Smarties have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stephenb (Talk) 10:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Smarties. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Smarties was changed by Leerobotham (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888489 on 2016-09-21T10:53:00+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Smarties, you may be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 10:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Smarties. Stephenb (Talk) 10:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)