User talk:Leezk

I also added a journal artical and a web citation...will add more! Leezk (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Leezk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Medici Archive Project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dipankan001 (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The Medici Archive Project


A tag has been placed on The Medici Archive Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dipankan001 (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Medici Project
The article was tagged for deletion by, so they may be in a better place to answer your query. However, when I checked the article before deleting it, my two main concerns were that (a) there was no evidence of notability - e.g. references to notable news sources and (b) it did read like a press release (particularly the fact that the article contained text that was hyperlinked to an external website (this should have been in an "External links" section at the bottom). The primary requirement is that you will have to show why this project is notable.

Also, when you leave messages on talk pages, please remember to sign by using ~ Thanks, Number   5  7  14:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you have recreated the article, but it has several flaws:
 * As advised previously, you should not hyperlink text in the body of the article to external websites
 * Section headings require "==" placed either side, not just making them bold
 * You need to categorise the article
 * There should be no space between references
 * I have fixed several of these problems in this edit. However, the article still needs to be improved (the list of fellows is unreferenced) and I am still concerned that all the references you have used are books (apart from the one that is self-referencing) so there is no easy verification of the project's notability. Number   5  7  16:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Medici Archive Project


A tag has been placed on The Medici Archive Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dipankan001 (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy tags
Please do not remove the deletion tags.If you want,you may want to contest deletion.If you again remove the tags,you will be blocked from editing.Dipankan001 (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Tacchi Bouchet Homage.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Tacchi Bouchet Homage.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Tacchi Coclea Thucea.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Tacchi Coclea Thucea.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Tacchi Simplicio.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Tacchi Simplicio.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Sfan00: I just updated authorship of that image. Please let me know if it is ok now. Leezk (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Francesco Guicciardini, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles V, Francis I and Siege of Florence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism concernig Francesco Guicciardini's article
With this edit you removed the pronunciation. This is a vandalism. Next time I'll contact an administrator of course. --Ebdòmero (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tito Canepa (March 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tito Canepa.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:APerson&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].


 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 16:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Talkback
APerson (talk!) 16:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Tito Canepa was accepted
 Tito Canepa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 01:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Talkback
APerson (talk!) 22:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tito Canepa triptych Enriquillo – Duarte – Luperón 1971.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tito Canepa triptych Enriquillo – Duarte – Luperón 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tacchi Bouchet Homage.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tacchi Bouchet Homage.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tacchi Coclea Thucea.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tacchi Coclea Thucea.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

The copyright for this photo belongs to Andrea Tacchi who gave me permission to use it for the Wikipedia entry. Leezk (talk) 11:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thanks for responding - as you might have seen on the request linked above, if Andrea Tacchi can send an email releasing all images you uploaded for them with a free license (see WP:CONSENT for a template, and check your uploads for full URLs to the files), that would be great and it would get around the confusion that exists at the moment. Let me know if you need more information. Deadstar (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tacchi Simplicio.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tacchi Simplicio.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your article Balestrieri fiorentini
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Balestrieri fiorentini to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with moving my page from English to Italian

Leezk (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Each Wikipedia is separate, with its own rules and customs. You will simply have to post the article yourself at the Italian Wikipedia. There is advice at WP:Translate us about translating articles from English.


 * As you blanked the Italian text here, I have deleted it - if that was a mistake, let me know. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice John! I'll try it now. (What Italian text did I blank I wonder??) Leezk (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You blanked Balestrieri fiorentini, the en-wp copy of your Italian article. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, of course! And I created a new Italian Wiki page. Thanks for pointing this out and yes, thannks for deleting the English language one too. Leezk (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:James J DeMartis Landscape with Sunflower ca 1958.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:James J DeMartis Landscape with Sunflower ca 1958.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Joseph DeMartis.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tacchi Kilkenny Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tacchi Kilkenny Photo.jpg, which you've attributed to Patrick Kilkenny. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 23:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Logan,
 * I obtained this photo directly from Andrea Tacchi who owns it. Would it be enough if I forwarded you an email from him stating that he gives his permission for its use? It's been on Wikipedia for over ten years now and it's never been a problem.
 * Thanks,
 * Lisa Leezk (talk) 17:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Logan,
 * I obtained this photo directly from Andrea Tacchi who owns it. Would it be enough if I forwarded you an email from him stating that he gives his permission for its use? It's been on Wikipedia for over ten years now and it's never been a problem.
 * Thanks,
 * Lisa Leezk (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)