User talk:Legacyproject

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --CliffC (talk) 00:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

references on Jim Zeigler
You can't just edit other Wikipedia articles to support your claims and then list those as your references. Click here for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Editorials and other opinion pieces are also not reliable sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The website you have added is also not a reliable source. I implore you to read WP:RS and try to understand what is and is not a reliable source. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

changing dates
Why do you keep changing the release date for the book? The source you provided clearly indicates it came out in '07, not just this month. This is called "introducing deliberate factual errors" and is considered vandalism, please stop. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Zeigler


A tag has been placed on Jim Zeigler, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BigDwiki (talk) 01:33, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Zeigler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Zeigler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Zeigler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigDwiki (talk) 04:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
BigDwiki (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC) --BigDwiki (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)