User talk:Legaladv

Speedy deletion of Legal advantage
A tag has been placed on Legal advantage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of advertising
Wikipedia does not allow advertising and the page you were writing clearly was advertising. The firm you wrote about does not meet our rules for inclusion as it was not sourced by reliable sources. I would suggest you read this and this before you go further.

You will also find that classless comments on user pages typically will not help you. JodyBtalk 02:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)