User talk:Legalnew

Legal Television Network spam on Wikipedia
Domains spammed:
 * http://clientelevision.com
 * http://www.legalnews.tv
 * http://www.legalnews.tv

Related domains:
 * http://www.howlawworks.com
 * http://www.irwinkramer.com
 * http://www.irwinkramer.com

Accounts:
 * Traceroutes to Baltimore, Maryland
 * Traceroutes to Baltimore, Maryland


 * Traceroutes to Owings Mills, Maryland
 * Traceroutes to Owings Mills, Maryland


 * Registered to an Owings Mills ISP
 * Registered to an Owings Mills ISP


 * Traceroutes to Towson, Maryland
 * Traceroutes to Towson, Maryland


 * Employed by site-owner
 * Employed by site-owner



Articles:
 * The Legal Television Network
 * LTVN (redirect page)

Reference:
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam

Public registration data:
 * Irwin Kramer
 * 500 Redland Court
 * Owings Mills, MD 21117

-- A. B. (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

File:LTVN.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LTVN.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 22:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Legal Television Network


The article The Legal Television Network has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Why was this deleted?
Full disclosure: I founded LTVN | Legal Television in order to make the law more understandable for laypersons. I never made any money on the project and spent a small fortune to produce extremely high quality content. You can view it for yourselves at www.clientelevision.com. We got some favorable press on it, but I must admit that I'm better at creating content than I am at navigating the internet world and getting better distribution. So the content hasn't taken off the way I had hoped it would, even though the feedback has been great. I would have thought that a site like Wikipedia, which I have supported for many years (probably among the few who donate each year), would be a "kindred spirit" in helping to make this content more accessible. I hate to put it like this, but I feel like you allow some organizations to publish information, while denigrating others, typically the smaller guys, for "promotion." I wish you would reconsider the deletion of this site. I am not a spammer, anything but. Perhaps, in your zeal to "protect" Wikipedia readers you might check out the content and see that the best way to protect them would be to give them a means of accessing it. Kramerslaw (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Irwin, I have replied to your question above on your user page at
 * User talk:Kramerslaw
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count)  03:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)