User talk:Legaltofu

I think you will have some problems with the page on Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, for she is not notable except for this one decision, and opinions vary over whether a single event is enough (I think it is, many don't). As soon as you have some additional sources about the decision, you might what to make a page about that instead and turn this into a redirect. It would be a shame to lose the information about this outrageous ruling. If that too should be questioned, get it into one of the other articles and make a redirect from the decision. Later, when there is an appellate ruling, then it will unquestionably be notable. DGG 15:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jacqueline Chooljian
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jacqueline Chooljian. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Chooljian. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)