User talk:Legendary Autism

Welcome!
Hello, Legendary Autism, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Barisan Nasional, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2018
Hello, I'm Richard0612. I noticed that you recently removed content from Barisan National without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Richard 0612  12:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid the note above is nonsense, Legendary Autism. You were quite right to remove the statement that the party's ideology is kleptocracy, corruption and cronyism, which was obviously vandalism to begin with. I can't understand why Richard restored it — perhaps he didn't read it. Thank you for removing vandalism, and I'm sorry you were warned for it. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC).
 * The note above is indeed nonsense, and I sincerely apologise for not looking closely at what I was doing, and treating you as a vandal rather than someone fighting vandalism. Your edit was valid and valuable, and I was entirely wrong to revert it. I shall take pains to fully investigate edits in future, and not act mindlessly as I did here. I hope this won't put you off from further contributing.  Richard 0612  13:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)