User talk:Legolost/Archive 2

Popups
If you've put the proper code in your monobook.js, you should get windows that appear when you hover over links. If that's not happening, try purging your cache (press Ctrl + F5). If you still can't get it to work, tell me and I'll do what I can. Good luck! --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 21:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I just noticed the other message you left me. How you revert vandalism depends on which Internet browser you have.  On both of them, you have to hover over "diff" links to be able to revert.  On Internet Explorer, there should be a link that says "rv."  On Mozilla Firefox, there should be an "actions" link, and if you hover over it, there should be  a "revert" link that appears.  Hope that helps, and happy vandal fighting! --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 22:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, you have to hover over the "last" link in the page history. To tell what edits they made, use the "compare versions" button to see the edits. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 22:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Glad I could help. :) --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 23:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

RE: Blocks
It's been done for fourty-eight hours, you were right to report it. Thank you. &mdash;Xyrael / 08:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Just let me know, and I'll look into it again :) &mdash;Xyrael / 11:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Not nonsense
Thanks for editing this encyclopedia (which is awesome btw). I actually have something to contribute to that page because those three sentences don't make sense. My first change was not appropriate, but I would like to change that 'Mickey Ratt' to 'Rough Cutt' because I believe it's correct. Is that ok?

Object to consolidating natural gas info on Hubbert peak theory?
Just seemed more organized that way. Reasons not to?70.132.29.215 04:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Luke
Hey Luke. Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 21:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image
Really sorry, I'm just coming a bit short of time in real life. Grade 10 is definately the hardest grade so far. >_< I'll try to get your box done in a short bit; the image will be a bit tougher to squeeze in, but I'll try and manage. Cheers, Master of Puppets The Walrus!  02:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:10 years old!!!
Just to let you know, she's actually almost 13. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 21:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * She's just weird sometimes. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 21:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not gonna work. She's mad at me over a stupid little thing cuz i asked her to apologized to me, and she won't, so she won't let me talk to here. Plus, earlier, she said that she purposely wanted to get banned, and she gets all happy when she does. So don't be reluctant to ban her, cuz she wants to. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 22:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * She hasn't made any encyclopediac contribution at all. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 23:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I know this sounds weird, but just ban her for a while. Maybe she'll be glad I got her banned even longer and not be mad at me anymore. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 23:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know, a week, I guess. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 23:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

JG55
I left her a stern note on her talk page; hopefully she straightens out. If she continues, she could be facing an indefinite block, seeing as she has made no encyclopedic contributions, and Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Thanks for the heads-up! --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 01:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I did see that. However, Deskana indef-blocked her for personal attacks, so no need to worry anymore. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 21:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Heya, thanks for your note. Looks like someone got there first. &mdash;Xyrael / 16:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Not at all - it took me some time to get round to it. Thanks. &mdash;Xyrael / 15:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Citizendium
Hey Luke, thanks for your congrats. I'm not sure about Citizendium. I guess it might seem more appealing to people who are experts in their field, but some people with impressive qualifications on the WP mailing list have said they aren't interested in it. So I don't know, what do you think? It sounds a bit like Larry Sanger's idea for Nupedia, which didn't really work out very well and eventually evolved into WP. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think you are right, Luke. I seem to remember reading somewhere that editors will have to sign up under their real names and that there won't be an anonymous or pseudonym editing. Yeah, Wiki is pretty famous isn't it. I think it will take a very long time and a lot of work for Citizendium to catch up. Cheers mate, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

E-mail
This is a question for your RfA in general: Do you have E-mail activated? Could you reply on my talk page please. Thanks -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 20:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If you mean activated for other users, no, I didn't, I do now : ) - jc37 20:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for answering! -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 21:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem : ) - jc37 01:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Point values
Out of curiosity (if you don't mind my asking), which of your 16 points did I receive? - jc37 01:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Um lets see.. hold on a minute... -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 01:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I've seemed to updated it since your i did your RfA, I do a new one for you and tel you what you received. Might take 5 minutes -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 01:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I've got it, your new score is 17, this is how you scored: This table is under Wikiright, a new type of right, only users of wikipedia can use my scoring chart. Hope that helps! :) -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 01:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1 -- for good Grammar & Spelling
 * 2 -- for 95% edit summaries
 * 3 -- for civility
 * 3 -- for 6 months+
 * 2 -- for In 1 project
 * 1 -- for E-Mail
 * 1 -- for good answers to questions
 * 2 -- for 2000+ edits

Yes, it does, actually, thank you.

Seeing how I am merely 3 points from going from a neutral to a support, was there anything "borderline" that I might be able to explain, or help point out difs with? - jc37 01:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes there is in fact. You could explain to me more clearly have you or haven't you had any edit conflicts or warring? To make it simple, yes of no.

Yes, I presume you might call them that : ) For example: WP:DENY - there have been issues over whether it should be a guideline yet. Eventually I started a new page for discussing it, in order to hopefully slowdown/stop the tag reversion warring. There was also a discussion that I was the "third party" discussing the islamic Barnstar. Right now I started a talk page discussion about Darth vader being an icon of evil : )

I've also been involved in the ongoing userbox discussions. - jc37 02:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

And, how much vandal fighting do you do (none, a bit, some, or a lot)?
 * I'm not certain exactly what you might call "vandal fighting". I do a lot of watching for vandalism of on "recent changes". And I have several hundred pages on my watch list that I check several times daily. I'm also fairly well versed in the various noticeboards, etc. - jc37 02:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

So, theoretically, you could score a maximum of 24 points. -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! 01:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I think I'm going to stick with neutral, except with 19 points, there's just some deep feeling, it's really odd. Hope your RfA passes though :-) -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! 03:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * No worries. Thank you for taking the time to discuss it. Oh, and even though it's a single point difference and still neutral, if you wouldn't mind updating the numeric value on the RfA page... : )
 * Thanks again : ) - jc37 03:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA input...
Hey Lego! Go sign this. Later... JungleCat   talk / contrib  23:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No probs. I didn't want someone to put that small unsigned text next to your stuff. ;-) JungleCat    talk / contrib  23:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Nathan's RfA
It is a morale support, to avoid a count of (0,63,12) or something along those lines. Just to make sure he doesn't get discouraged from editing just because of an RfA. Believe me, my usual RfA standards are much more stringent.  Canadian - Bacon  t  c   e 05:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, one vote won't make a difference on the Cratz descision at the end of the day :P If someone else had voted Support already it would have been an oppose from me, just being nice.  Canadian - Bacon  t  c   e 06:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Admin Assessment Scale
I just notice your Admin Assessment Scale while going over MoRsE's RfA, and I wished to compliment you on it niftiness. I am even contemplating adapting it.-- danntm T C 13:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for devandalizing my userpage
←Humus sapiens ну? 21:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

homestead
the population of the school has grown. i updated it with a more accurate number. it was in the school bulletin.

Response to your question
Yes, I am e-mail enabled. (I thought I mentioned that in my RfA...?) Let me know if you have other questions! -- Merope Talk 09:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Response to your question
Yep, I have e-mail enabled. I checked just now and it works wonderfully. Huzzah for extra points! :-) Irongargoyle 06:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
I apologize. I had no clue how the information was considered valid, so I left the extra information to see if it was moderated in any way. I also did this with the FOOTBALL article. I apologize and will refrain from contributing false information in the future.

Signpost updated for October 2nd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
i never knew a nother kid almost my age (im 13) that likes texas hold'em--jesusfreek2 04:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC) God bless u

i never knew a nother kid almost my age (im 13) that likes texas hold'em--jesusfreek2 04:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC) God bless u

Supermarine Spitfire FPC vote
Hi Legolost, I was wondering if you had a preference for an edit version on Featured picture candidates/Supermarine Spitfire XVI? If you do not specify an edit, your vote will count as a support for the original version. Thanks! --Fir0002 23:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Just wanted to send a quick note of thanks for your support in my RfA. I was quite pleased because I didn't know if I'd quite make your criteria, but I did. :-) I really appreciate it! Best, Irongargoyle 17:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 16th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Your admin test...
Hi Legolost! I know you're not around (which I find quite shocking :), but your test for admins says that you're more likely to support someone you personally know before the RfA. Don't you think this is slightly non-NPOV? Still, I'll use your test, should I run for adminship, even if you're not on the wiki yet. Hope you decide to return early! | A ndonic O  Talk 21:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Juno from Celestia.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Juno from Celestia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Your return
Alright, I'm looking forward to seeing you around. Glad you returned. ;) · AO Talk 19:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, sorry for the late answer, I forgot after I read it. · AO Talk 19:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Errant move
Hi there,

I noticed you moved Johnsonville Branch to Johnsonville Train Line. Although Metlink may currently refer to the Johnsonville Branch by a different name, I am afraid that your move was in error and I have requested that the article be moved back to the old title to conform with Wikipedia convention, with Johnsonville Train Line left as a redirect. The standard for NZR branch line article titles is "[Terminus] Branch"; this is consistently applied to every single branch line in the country and the policy is outlined in the NZR Manual of Style. If a line is also referred to by a different name, convention is to note this in the intro (and to establish a redirect page under the different name) - a good example is the Wairio Branch, currently known as the Ohai Industrial Line. Please keep this in mind before moving any other articles.

Have a good one. - Axver 06:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)