User talk:LehPeople

August 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Leh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Leh district. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

What Disruption. I have added what ten sources are saying. I will go to admin if you threatened me again.


 * You have not been threatened. You have been warned. That is not the same thing. You can't continue to use Wikipedia as your own personal soapbox. Adding references to bad content does not make it good. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: your threat to call an admin if you don't get your own way
You are very welcome to call an admin to look into this if you really want to. I don't recommend it. There is such thing as a WP:Boomerang which might come back on you but if you are sure that you have done nothing wrong then please feel free to give it a try. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

And, FYI, at least one of the people removing the material is an admin. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Then I will be calm and wait as per WP:Boomerang. Then I will contest my edit with any other neutral admin who will play a judge between us.

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kargil. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Kautilya3
2 saal say tery ko kuta bna diya mea nay, tu hr wqt hr jga kutay ki tra mujy dhudta hay. Itna time zaya kr k Sp I file krta hay. Itni mehnat mza aa gya. tu mera paltu kuta hay or mera time pass hay, Mery peechay BSO page pr aya or ab Kargil aya pta nhi kidr kidr ghumaya tujy mea nay. teri attention ko divert krta raha. Mea bola tha na tery ko, ki teri maa ko nanga kr k chodunga, ab dekh na wada pura kiya na mea nay ? Ab zra soch k tu jitna tang hua us say zyada Hum Kashmiri 69 years say tum india say tng haen. Sharm kro na khud poverty mitatay ho na apnay 600 million without wash room people ki or na Pak afghan central asia china k progress krnay detay ho. zid bna kr bethay ho or trillions gora hrami say weapons pr zaya kr rhay ho. Khud ko genious smjtay ho or ek number k bewqoof ho. DHANEVAD