User talk:LehmanGirlMD/Literacy

peer review- Rampersad
-


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * - If the article is about the effects of socio economic status of children's literacy ability, then yes. If the article was about literacy and a broad definition of it, then no.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * - The article does a well just at remaining neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * - Yes, from what I can see, there is only one source cited, which means that more viewpoints and research is needed.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * - Citations are not provided in the proper format, citations need to be added to the bibliography section.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * - See above, more citations needed.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * - Citations/Research.

Literacystudent (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)