User talk:Leil.pfitzner

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your edit summary
Your description about linking a list of brands being contrary to Wikipedia's "best practices" is just not true. The only caveat on that is not to abuse primary sources coming from the company to try and advance an extraordinary/likely to be challenged claim by it (which the source wasn't, it just was used to support an item list) or use it to promote the company in the article in any way (which again it wasn't). If we had a strict limit on using as references fluff and PR from companies we couldn't link annual reports, registered documents, and so and so on. There's no guideline on which references should be listed in a company infobox, just a policy that anything listed should be directly sourced. Ignoring your misleading and confrontational edit summary, in my opinion your changes by themselves are OK or at least mixed (your "steady" is debatable, but I agree it can be considered as such). Urbanoc (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)