User talk:Leilanidowding

November 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Cycl o pia talk  13:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Further to the above. Please make sure to include an Edit summary describing your changes. Please do not delete material that has a source. If the source is incorrect or not reputable then got to the Talk/Discussion page and make a note of it there, preferably providing a better source that contradicts it. (N.B. An article on the Leilani Dowding website would count as a better source.) -- Horkana (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Would it? It would be a primary source, I am not sure it would be a better source. -- Cycl o pia talk  10:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)