User talk:Leireorduna

Ongi etorri!
Good to see another editor interested in Basque stuff, we are too few! Could I urge you though to have a quick look at pages like WP:FIVE which lay out things about style and suchlike? I've noticed that many of your edits are well-intentioned, but not very encyclopaedic, meaning they're a bit flowery and lack references. Especially on mythology articles saying that "laminka are ..." is not that good because that suggests they exist, we're better off saying things like "are said to be". Also, mythology is a tricky topic and attracts people with extreme ideas. It's always best to find a printed reference and say where you got your info from. It avoids trouble for all. If you need help with refs, give me a shout, ok? Izan untsa Akerbeltz (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Lamia (Basque mythology) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lamia (Basque mythology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lamia (Basque mythology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DreamGuy (talk) 23:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)