User talk:Leistto

September 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to She-Hulk: Attorney at Law seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * How is it neutral point of view if you deliberately won't let people know how the audience have received the series? There is dramatic difference between critics ratings compared to audience ratings. Now you let people think that this is some kind of masterpiece which clearly it is not. I also think that almost 10 000 audience reviews speaks more clearly than 500 critics reviews. Leistto (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Audience scores at Rotten Tomatoes aren't reliable.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * So this is how you see "neutral point of view"? You censor facts that can be seen in the site that you use as a source but you cherry pick the data for wikipedia and won't let anybody publish the facts that you don' t like. Seems very neutral :D If you are not getting paid by doing this I just can' t figure what else could be the reason. Please explain? Leistto (talk) 21:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The best place to learn why opt-in polls are unreliable is in a statistics class. DonQuixote (talk) 23:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)