User talk:LembasAlba

Welcome!
Hello, LembasAlba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Scots language has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Theresa May. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 18:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gender pay gap. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced personal commentary. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 18:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Conservative Party (UK). Final warning for adding non-neutral personal comments on multiple articles, such as this edit on Conservative Party (UK). - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 18:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Good article templates
Hi,

You created Euphoria pop with a good article tag on it. Good articles are peer-reviewed and the policy on that can be found here.

Thanks,

Dr Strauss  talk  13:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Euphoria pop


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Euphoria pop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm L.R. Wormwood. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United Kingdom local elections, 2017 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)