User talk:Lembasts

Welcome!

 * }

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Feliks Zemdegs has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/6/5AgqkmyLr3s, http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/6/5AgqkmyLr3s, http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/3/w5Iund4m52w, http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/13/kHqcsYQMev8, http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/13/kHqcsYQMev8, http://www.youtube.com/fazrulz1#p/u/15/dcNJ6I5yuoM. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

World records
Please do not change the world record speedcubing scores in ways that disagree with the World Cube Association Official Results at worldcubeassociation.org. If that page is out of date, contact them and get it fixed before trying to change Wikipedia. Guy Macon 20:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

As two WCA delegates are present, the records are official. There is simply an administrative delay in getting to the WCA website. User:Lembasts


 * Then wait until the delay is over and the site is updated, then make your changes. Wikipedia cannot accept changes based upon nothing better than "somebody named Lembasts says so."

This is your final warning. Do it again and you will risk being blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Guy Macon 23:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  00:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The block has indeed expired. What message are you getting when you try to edit?  Kuru   (talk)  02:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I cant remember the message as it is no longer there (fortunately). I think it was an IP based message. Lembasts (talk) 04:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

COI
Hi David, As Feliks Zemdegs' father, I suggest you read WP:COI. Just a friendly reminder. Thanks, Ssgem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssgem (talk • contribs) 22:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

I can edit it. Alternatively, you can use the request edit template (shown on the COI page) on his article's talk page and someone else will do it. I likely will, however. After all, he is the greatest speedcuber of all time ;) Ssgem 02:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

User:ClueBot NG takes care of most of the vandalism, and what doesn't get taken care of by it gets taken care of by me. It's not that I'm trying to be rude I just don't want you to get blocked. That being said, I can't stop you and I understand how much it means to you, so, by all means, edit at your own risk. It's not disruptive editing so the admins shouldn't have an issue with it, but they might. We have over 1200 administrators and therefore over 1200 opinions. Thanks, Ssgem 02:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)