User talk:LemmeyBOT

Removing ref tags within nowiki tags
See User:Gadget850/Cite errors. For some reason, the bot removed the ref tags from within. Tags within a nowiki should probably be excluded. --— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  12:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Bug ??
BOT has restored version of article with great editorial mistake --Rjecina (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * This bot is malfunctioning. An administrator needs to block it.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Broken nested ref in edit history broke the bot. Aricle has since been fixed and should not reenter bots queue. --Lemmey talk 21:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi LemmeyBOT, great fixes on a few of the articles I am watching! That error in the cite tag was fixed very nicely. Thank-you, Colin MacLaurin (talk) 09:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Great fix! What a horrible Red mark in the references section until you came along! --haha169 (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Bug report


I'd rather have a broken cite tag than have half of the article get moved into a never-ending footnote :-) --Steve (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop combining "identical" refs into one name
There are reasons why an article might choose not to do it intentionally. Gimmetrow 23:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked for one day. Suggest you add code that makes the bot stop if messages appear on the talk page. Gimmetrow 23:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

If a ref appears in a comment then it should not be included in any type of matching. See this example Mikemill (talk) 05:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Did that get it? SQL Query me! 19:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes they seemed to be cascading off each other, very annoying. --Lemmey talk 19:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)