User talk:LemmeyBOT/Archives

The Great Block Debate
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.


 * This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:
 * Add  This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Changing username.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you.


 * Please famiarize yourself with our Bot Policy. You cannot run a bot without approval via WP:BRFA.  Please file a BFRA with your main account, and once that process gets going, we can unblock this account.  - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Bot_policy and bottom of the page there, that looks familiar. --Lemmey talk 06:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

If we blocked all accounts with "Bot" undergoing a Bot request for approval, it would make the bot approval process a little difficult. Unblocked. Gimmetrow 20:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Charlottetown Resolves
"In cases where the function of the bot is not one that already holds general widespread acceptance, or at the discretion of BAG members when greater community feedback is desired, the request may first move to an extended trial of approximately one month. --Bot policy"

Resolved, Whereas fixing missing references from especially complicated edit histories is a concept that holds general widespread acceptance not though committee or spoken consensus but by the core tenets of laid out in the Wikipedia pillars, this bot reserves the right to act in a period of extended trial as it alone deems necessary. --Lemmey talk 06:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

BOTMODE
This bot is Currently Operating in Manual Confirmation Mode and as such does not require a BOT approval. --Lemmey talk 14:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * BOT is operating in trial mode for automated edits with individual testing of modifications still done in manual mode. --Lemmey talk 02:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Bug-kinda
- Duplicated the ref. Thanks for the work so far, though. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The reference was interepreted as broken as it included the text Blah Blah Blah . BOT's edit did not seriousy detriment article (the reference text did appear in the article and a hanging remained in the code. The article has since been fixed. This instance is considered isolated and low risk but is also considered to be repeatable. I will watch out for similar occuances in the future. --Lemmey talk 17:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\btypepad\.com\b' (link(s): http://alex62.typepad.com/imsablog/2006/01/index.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 21:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

buggy edit
See. I fixed it up in the next edit. - Merzbow (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Bug
The bot is doing some edit Expulsion of Muslims from the Northern province by LTTE which I feel are not constructive. For example, it is adding non cited material back that was removed because they were not cited for a period of time. Further clean up that was done to the article is being readded by the bot. Can the owner please correct this issue. Thanks Watchdogb (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)