User talk:Lemonflash/Archive2

Order of Good Cheer
Hello,

I noted that you were over on the Good Cheer page. If possible, could you do some work on the page. "Chevalier Teslar has done a fair job on the site, but it needs some additional work. I do not know how to set in pictures. Perhaps you can advise me on that esoteric art.

Have a great day

Dr. Carl Edwin Lindgren Royalhistorian 04:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Politics rule 18:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher Application
Dear Lemonflash,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher!

Martinp23 21:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

copyright
Its best to read WP:COPY for full details, but in essence when a person creates something they have a moral right as creator of the work(what ever its form), this right isnt transferred when the work is sold either. As creator your entitled to compensation when your work is displayed how you receive this compensation is where copyright offers choices.

If I take a photo I can release it as public domain to which I'm saying you can use this any way you want I dont want anything for it. Almost the same is GFDL/GNU is you can use this but you are required to attribute my efforts to me(Wikipdeias general license, hence the edit history for all pages). to that you can add a creative commons license that says you must attribute this to me, but dont need to ask first. Outside of these you get whats commonly known as "copyright" to which I say you must ask for my permission first and I'll set conditions of use, if you dont do this I'll have you in court faster than a wino to a bottle opening. Gnangarra 13:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

signature colours
Can you please change your signature colouring as it difficult to read, There is an essay on the subject of signature colours I'll fnid it and drop a link here shortly. Gnangarra 13:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:SIG is the link Gnangarra
 * thats alot better Gnangarra 00:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Lemonflash! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Strong password userbox
Looks good, but too late. --One Salient Oversight 06:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Strong Password Userbox
Hello! I use your strong password userbox (User:Lemonflash/ubx/Passwordstrength) and would like to make a suggestion. The link is to hard to see on the black background. I recommend that you use the font color tag to force the link's text to white, making it easier to see. -- FastLizard4 ( Talk | Contribs ) 02:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I saw the change, I think it's better now. I had this same problem with some of my userboxes too, until I found out how to change the font of a link.
 * -- FastLizard4 ( Talk | Contribs ) 17:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Protected pages
If you check the edit history of the page the reason for protection will be in an edit summary when the protection was added. In the case of the article in question it was due to edit warring which occurs when editors keep reverting each others edits, the protection is such that only admins can edit which we arent suppose to do, there are exception to that. Your image request is one what you do is add Editprotected to the talk page with a note indicating what the problem is and how to remedy it. Alternative is if its not a big problem you could also just wait until the protection expires.

The policy information on this at WP:RFPP, here you can request page protection and unprotection as well. Gnangarra 01:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

RFA
Thanks so much for supporting me in the RFA. I am grateful for your response, and it really means a lot to be appreciated. Thanks again!  hmwith  talk  04:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Edits on S- Theory

 * Thanks for your help there Lemonflash. I tried to revert a testedit of some anon/user, but there was too much going on. Please contact user:Newbyguesses via Talk:Newbyguesses if you have any suggestions. (btw)- the Edit Review shows a conscientious and intelligent editor at work. Best wishes then. &mdash; Newbyguesses 01:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Jtoomer 01:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 02.02 BST, 02 June 2007

mr flash, by all means i adopt "good faith" but i also adopt a good degree of intelligence on behalf of wikipedia "editors", therefore please investigate my issue because i myself was practising "good faith" by getting rid of the incorrect information in the first place

xxx

Could you explain why the recent edits were considered vandalism? Im having trouble editing the references but the recent reverted edits laid out a way that was clearest. What explicitly do I have to change?

How about i save everyone elses time by editing it myself? therefore providing a more efficient and effective wikipedia for us all, or is that too straight forward?

Jtoomer 01:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC) additionally, i have just discovered that the article i have discovered is wrong, has been checked by a robot....because its a biographical "stub", surely this backs up my theory that it is quicker and easier for a human to sort of obvious problems on the page...if you would like to have a look yourself, please read the article......mark randall, professional arsenal FC footballer

Jtoomer 01:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC) i understand your point of view entirely, everyone should have the right to discuss and debate articles in which the truth is hard to discover and is not entirely obvious. However, when such utter nonsense is written in an article about masturbation and "mr blobby" it shouldnt take a discussion on a "board" for it to be sorted it. The website states that any information on biographical articles which is obviously untrue should be changed immediately. I have since entered the problem into the 'Biographies of living persons Noticeboard' and hope that this form on electronic democracy works, eventhough in this case it is not necassary.

Jtoomer 01:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC) well that wasnt difficult was it sir, thank you (defeats the point of your option of the notice board though doesnt it?...just a "headsup" for you)

Jtoomer 01:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC) my sincere apologies madam, perhaps a more comprehensive profile would have helped ;) thanks for the help

Thank you
Hi Lemonflasher, Just wanted to thank you for the warm welcome, it is appreciated! Wishing you all the best. Regards, Einstein A.

Question
Dear Lemonflash, I am still learning the ins and outs of Wikipedia. Can you tell me if this is from you: Jtoomer 01:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC) my sincere apologies madam, perhaps a more comprehensive profile would have helped ;) thanks for the help

I know it reads Jtoomer but when clicked it brought me back to you. If so, did you want a profile from me?

Confused :) Einstein A.

Sorry
Thank you Lemonflash. I'm still learning. Einstein A.

Sarah
Something went haywire with my anti-vandal program. I went back and looked through the history. I think that I have now put up the correct version. Martinbot reverted one edit, but actually reverted to a vandalized version. I'll look at it again. thanks. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 01:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup: you just reverted to a vandalized version  &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 01:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I hear you: there has been a lot here for the past hour! &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 01:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Geographic pole
"You asked why someone kept reverting your edits? Well it's a bot, and the information on there is just fine."


 * Some were a bot, some not. The information on that page is, apparently, not "just fine". That's why it has been given an "expert attention" flag. The technical information requested on the talk page is covered at North Pole and South Pole. There is no point rehashing all that again at Geographic pole. If Geographic pole were to be turned into a proper article (rather than a very barely enhanced dictionary definition) then it would only repeat what's already at North Pole and South Pole. What's the point of that? Better to just turn it into a redirect page IMO. Matt 01:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC).

Thank you
I appreciate Lemonflash and will give that a try. Einstein A.

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA ...
Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 06:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Signature
Please change the size of your signature. As it currently stands, it is too large and takes up too much space in the editting window.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 23:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: 'sacred cow' article ..
I have done couple of changes to 'sacred cow' adding a Picture of 'GowSala' a Cow-Shelter in Guntur, India, that protects Cows in that region. I am not sure why, but the changes were removed and the version of 'sacred cow' reverted back. Could you please explain why that is?

Thanks

adoptee - grad
I been watching and digging in your contributions, and I think that you should replace the with. I'll always be available to assist if you need it but I think that you dont need to seen as being watched over anymore, as matter of fact I think you would be great at adopting someone new and helping them along. Gnangarra 06:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh and when you do feel free to change the tag on my user page to .. Gnangarra 06:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Adoption
Thanks Lemonflash. I'll have considered it and am going to accept your adoption. Thank you again. In the most sincere manner, - A Sprig  of Fig  & a lock of holly  16:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks! In the most sincere manner, - A Sprig   of Fig  & a lock of holly  19:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/CharlotteWebb
Please can I respectively ask you to go back to the above page, I've made a comment regarding your oppose.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  23:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats
Congratulations on finding my secret page! I started out with this one, and will make a harder one in the future, and have them get harder as I go on ("secret page 2", "secret page 3", etc.). I'll let you know when "secret page 2" goes into effect. Cheers! hmwith talk  13:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * My second secret page is in effect. Better get looking! =) hmwith  talk  19:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Star Wars Episode VI ACID
I saw your nomination of this page. Although I've already voted, I went ahead and made a few improvements to the page. Regards --Milton 23:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: 'sacred cow' article ..
Thanks for the reply. I have added the picture back in the Article.