User talk:LemonisLime/sandbox

Gender Equality in El Salvador is a very well written article used to represent the laws protecting all men and women in El Salvador. Throughout the entire article, nothing had stuck out to me. I found this article to be neutral, however it only spoken from a third-party view. I feel as if the information on Domestic Violence and on Political involvement of Women in El Salvador could include more information, as both sections were very brief. Some of the citations did not have working links, and the consistency of the style of citations was not uniform. I found a few facts that were referenced from some untrustworthy looking websites, and with the untrustworthy appearances, comes a lot of bias favoring women. A lot of information is dates from 2011-2012. To improve, they can update the statistics and use websites that constantly have updated information. I wish that there were more facts and statistics provided about women in El Salvador in general. The talk page was filled with simple suggestions about expanding on certain subjects to provide readers with the most abundant and recent information possible. The article is graded as a C and is not currently apart of any WikiProjects. I don’t believe this object quite got to its rhetorical objective yet, but once worked on it can be written to its full potential.

Article Evaluation: Marital Rape
In the evaluation of the Wikipedia article Marital Rape, there are several issues I found within my reading. The article was consistent in the information given to the reader. I did not find any distractions other than the change in fonts in sub section titles within the article. It’s not formatted consistently, so it looks quite sloppy. This issue includes the use of several different fonts which makes it out to be an eyesore in terms of the Wikipedia standard for the look of an article. The article is at some points, neutral and even mentions that though it is more common to happen to women, that doesn’t mean it exclusively happens to them. However, there are more sub sections that I wish the writers used to give statistics about both sexes. To give the male to female ratio could provide the reader with a better understanding on how common and uncommon it can be for either. Female to Male violence is completely underrepresented. The authors can provide more information on what this could entail in general. The citations I checked were mainly sources that supported the claims in the article, however there were about four sources that did not work. This article barely has cited sources. I found that its sources being provided, are from neutral unbiased sources. The sources are insanely outdated. A lot of the statistics provided dates back to information from the late 80’s to the early 90’s. There are certainly more recent studies that were made and that can be used to improve the credibility of the article. The talk page is full of all the issues I have mentioned above, it there are also a large amount of source archives. I also stumbled upon a lot of attitude from authors and visitors on the talk pages. This article is ranked as a class C. There are currently five WikiProjects it is currently a part of. This article has a long way to go before it can achieve the rhetoric objective, but it certainly can happen after heavy source citing. This articles style of writing also does not fit the average Wikipedia type. It is sometimes unfocused and off balance. It was made clear to me within the first few paragraphs I ready that this was edited by newer and younger editors. I also feel that not all the information was totally relevant to the topic and that future authors need to hyperlink to other Wikipedia article because too much time was spent explaining things that they did not need to. LemonisLime (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2018 (UTC)