User talk:Lemonlord55

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Persona 5 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Persona 5 was changed by Lemonlord55 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850797 on 2017-04-10T13:54:22+00:00.

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at .hack//G.U., you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't see how it was "unsourced or poorly sourced" since what I said was the truth but whatever. --Lemonlord55 (talk) 23:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Please also stop changing the lead in .hack (video game series). Your text does not follow grammar correctly. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Sure, but your literally wording the same thing that I was saying in your own way. Which honestly yours don't make any sense when it comes to grammar, like who puts a year date before the title at the end of a sentence?. Usually a title comes before the date even at the end of a sentence. The only thing I changed mostly was .hack//frägment and saying it's a " remake " doesn't make sense, since it doesn't use any new hardware or a new graphics engine because it uses the same game engine and hardware as the original game series so therefore it's not a remake. So I don't see no where else stating that it is a remake but here. Lemonlord55 (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It was not "titled .hack//G.U. Last Recode in 2017"; this construction implies that its title was Last Record only in 2017, which is incorrect. Fragment is a remake because it retells the entire IMOQ story. New hardware is not a requirement for a remake. Axem Titanium (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure re-telling a story does make it a Remake in some regard. You could also say a Remaster is re-telling a story too but does that mean a remaster is a remake no it doesn't because it's just a remaster of it's original game that was just simply remastered on. Also a remake using an old hardware?, is usually unheard of (e.g. a game could come out on a PS1 but would get a remake on a PS2 and even then that would be a remake because it would be re-telling the whole story on a different and newer hardware). Remakes and Remasters have always used new hardware and the only difference is that remaster uses the same graphics engine but improved upon but on a different hardware. Have you even looked up your own site's remake page because I quote from it's page "usually for the purpose of modernizing a game for newer hardware" The game itself is not a remake. If it was nothing but else re-telling the story for the whole game then it's a remake but that was not the main purpose of the game to re-tell the whole story since it's only purpose was to be used for the offline mode, if anything it is more of an adaptation just added into the game. It was just featured in it, if you had nothing else to do. So because it has an Online mode as well which is the main purpose of the game for existing then it's not a remake because it has a whole other story included into it which you can make yourself with your friends and doing it's online mode missions. I stated once before it uses the same game engine as the original game series and not even using anything remotely new to the game in terms graphics or gameplay, it is basically the same as the original game series. Anyway I'm done talking about this, so i'm not going to even edit the page anymore so don't worry. This whole thing is subjective. Anyone could be right or wrong. Lemonlord55 (talk) 11:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)