User talk:LenaGikkas

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  Bovlb (talk) 07:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Warning!!
You should explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in here. While you're editing the article anyway, please consider improving it, especially to address the concerns given as a reason for deletion. I have added a proposal for deletion again in the page as it of no significance. Please discuss this in the article's talk page.-- Ankithreya!  08:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nicolas Gikkas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mbisanz (talk) 19:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Talk: Nicolas Gikkas: This article should not be deleted.

1. This article is written in proper encyclopedia biography style with proper usage of English language. 2. The article is informative, educational, and useful to the reader. 3. In Google search engine there are over 100 hits on article "International Licensing of Intellectual Property: The Promise and the Peril" written by Nicolas Gikkas in 1996, and this is the first article in Wikipedia referencing it and the author with links to his current achievements in the field of Intellectual Property and Patent works. 4. I am not creating a personal article about "myself, my band" etc. Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nicolas_Gikkas"

AfD nomination of Nicolas Gikkas
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nicolas Gikkas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)