User talk:Lena the Dancer

Welcome!

Hello, Lena the Dancer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andy cherry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ncboy2010 (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Andy Cherry
I just want to remind you that even though both of us are fans of his work this does not mean we can add puffery to the article. I deleted the speedy deletion tag on your user page because he is in fact notable but I cannot vouch for Moriah Peters at this point to satisy music biography criteria. I would love it if you would find the stuff for Moriah Peters that would satify Nos. 1 or 2.HotHat (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Moriah Peters
I have created an article that would be ready to go as soon as we see if her album charts.HotHat (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This article is now notable!HotHat (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Help Me! I keep receiving a message through email that says that I can't add puffery to the article about Andy Cherry, but I have received this message about fifteen times! Who keeps sending it to me?

Lena


 * Not me Lena, I never email another Wikipedia editor! I just posted it once on your talk page.HotHat (talk) 23:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Just wanted to make sure it was not, like, a prank or something.

Speedy deletion nomination of One Sonic Society


A tag has been placed on One Sonic Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

helpme I have disabled the tag for now. Did you have a question?  Rcsprinter  (chatter)  19:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello! I didn't notice your query on this article until now, as you placed it on my user page rather than my talk page. Regarding why the article was deleted, it was a recreation of material the community previously agreed should be deleted, at Articles for deletion/One Sonic Society. The concerns at the discussion centered on the lack of sourcing for the article to demonstrate notability. That problem might now be fixable, but in order to stay, a recreated article must fix the issue brought up at the deletion discussion. In this case, since the concern was notability (sourcing), the recreation must have sufficient citations to reliable sources that cover the band in-depth and are not related to or published by the bands, its agents, etc. If you can find such sourcing, it may be that you could make an acceptable recreation. If that type of sourcing doesn't exist yet, I'm afraid the band still isn't an appropriate article subject, and isn't until they've been more widely noted. Hope that helps, and please ping me on my talk page if you have any additional questions. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Input
You may now want to have your say here about One Sonic Society.HotHat (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)