User talk:Leninist

Editing concern
The reference "Ross Kettleson, An Explanation of Triism, Providence, 2007, Kettleson"...is this a book or ???? It is quite hard to tell from the way you put it there and it does not really fulfill verifiability. I will give you some other links in a second to help you as well. -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 05:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Triism
One of the reasons I have been monitoring the article is that it has been deleted twice before. I am not yet convinced that it should be deleted again nor am I really convinced that the subject matter meets wikipedia criteria for verifiability. Honestly, if the only documentation that exists to verify it is a pamphlet, it really does not meet Notability. Regardless, I do not plan to be the admin who deletes it if this is the case, as I am trying to give you time to learn about editing with us here in wikipedia, and perhaps time to save the article. I am confident that you are posting this in good faith, and want you to know that good faith edits are respected in our project. The references in my welcome should help you with your future work. best,  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 12:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk pages and user pages
Regarding user talk pages, it is preferred to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here, under "When pages get too long." Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've received. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking your talk page is relatively less appropriate, as it is not actually yours but instead belongs to us all. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. When you desire to keep the "clutter" down on your user talk page, I suggest that you create archives for these messages. I would be happy to assist you in doing just that if you ask me to. You can see a sample of archives (mine) here. As for your user page, most users seem to use it as a place to describe themselves as people and/or editing entities. Many collect links to pages they are working on and/or have been working on. You user page is more "yours," in a way, than anywhere else on wikipedia, but is not intended to serve as a personal webpage either. Once again, read here to learn more about this. --  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 12:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Wikiland
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard Ω6  12  15:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)