User talk:Lenny230

Welcome!

Hello, Lenny230, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Recent changes for mobile numbers in Peru, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E. Fokker (talk) 17:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rab V (talk) 20:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Talk page guidelines
Are to be found at Talk page guidelines. They might help you when posting to talk pages. Your latest post at talk:trans woman is barely legible and full of empty space. It doesn't help you make your point if nobody can be bothered to read it!!! - Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 14:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I think my post is very clear and the spaces actually help visualize the content. Lenny230 11:30, 5 July 2020 (US EDT)
 * That's because you are new to Talk pages. -Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 15:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I stand by my post. And I add that there is censorship on this article. So against Wikipedia principles --Lenny230 (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Funcrunch (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Surprising to see that there is censorship (regardless of how you call it) if one does not align with the imposed definition. --Lenny230 (talk) 23:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)