User talk:Lennytran

June 2016
Hello, I'm C.Fred. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bảo Đại seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bảo Đại. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Your "Reader discretion is advised" disclaimer makes it clear that you are editing with an agenda regarding this article. I strongly suggest you refrain from editing the article and discuss the situation at Talk:Bảo Đại to see if there is support for any of your changes.'' —C.Fred (talk) 02:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Bảo Đại shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 02:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

User talk:LeThaiTo
El_C 06:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * It seems more than likely the other account is connected to you, but that doesn't change anything as to both of your identical disruptive edits. Point is, you can't argue with the article prose and state "[b]efore finishing this article, readers should consider a few things:" in a section title Remarks—Wikipedia articles do not work this way. If you were more than a single purpose account you would know that by now. For now, you have the option of figuring out how to convey your content according to Wikipedia standards on the article talk page (which may or may not be possible, but you are welcome to try) or for both accounts to be indefinitely blocked. Well, for now the page is protected, so you have no choice, but in the future, these are your options. El_C 18:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

____________________________

Please refrain from editing for now, even after the article protection status has been released.LeThaiTo (talk) 00:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If both of you are actually two separate individuals, you can each participate on the article talk page right now. I just don't know that editors will give you the same weight as the combined opinion of two editors, seeing that your single purpose seems identical. Because of that, it is difficult to not think that you two, if not the same person, at least are somehow connected, seeing you only edit the one article plus the one addition. But I suppose it's possible, if implausible. El_C 01:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Like I told LeThaiTo, the section on my user talk page regarding Bảo Đại is located here. Your comment to me and my reply to it are both located there. Thanks. El_C 02:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)