User talk:Leofric1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Weirdy  Talk  07:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

December 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Please see User:MBK004 for more info. -MBK004 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Launching
Thanks for the updates to this template, but please be careful of engaging in hour to minute updates of the "launching" template. Wikipedia is not a countdown clock, that's why we should link to one (which we don't, because NASA managed to break their webpage last week. i'll see if the clock can now be added again). Something like 1 day, 12 hours, 3 hours, hour will more than suffice. Also please do not things like T-. I think too few people that read this will know what that is. And if they do want to know, then can visit the real countdown clock. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

CSD#G4 on Crystal Ennis
Hi Leofric1,

I removed your speedy deletion tag of Crystal Ennis, as the criteria you tagged it under (G4 - recreated material) only applies to articles that have been deleted through an XfD discussion. I have, however, gone ahead and tagged the article for proposed deletion, as there seems to be some assertion of notability in the inclusion of the profiling article.

Thanks! -- jonny - m t  08:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

-- Well, it was a repost of a deleted article. What would be a better tag to use? Leofric1 (talk) 08:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion policy notes that recreated articles can often just be tagged for the same reason they were deleted for in the first place. I know it sounds a bit illogical, but it makes sense when you consider that XfDs are long processes designed to foster consensus while CSDs are short affairs that generally concern three editors (the article creator, the tagger, and the deleting admin) at most.  If the article is repeatedly created and deleted--especially for the same reason--administrators have the option of salting the link to prevent unsupervised page creation. -- jonny - m  t  09:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

CSD on Welsh valley middle school
The tag that you placed on Welsh valley middle school was for lack of content. However, the reason it was empty was because an anonymous user blanked the page. Please check the edit history when choosing the type of tag. (The article was speedily deleted, though, but for lack of notability.) --UberScienceNerd Talk Contributions 03:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

geo-stubs
Hi - good to see you doing some stub sorting, but could I please ask that - when you do geo-stubs - where possibly you use the coun try specific stub? Saves me having to resort them later fro. Almost every country in the world now has its own geo-stub in the form CountryName-geo-stub. If in doubt, try it with preview, and if it doesn't work then use geo-stub. Most should though. Thanks - and keep up the good work! Grutness...wha?  23:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

St Kilda Cricket Club stub
Thanks for improving my stub. :-) Wakedream (talk) 18:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Henry Fancourt White
Hi, I noticed you put a British people stub on this article - did I miss something? Rotational (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

-- Well, I patrol the category frequently and try to find better stub categories for articles. In this case, it's a biographical article about a guy from the UK. Leofric1 (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

-- oopsy, he's from Australia after all. My apologies. Leofric1 (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Your edit to Steam cannon was really helpful, there are so many stub-types. Tcrow777Talk 22:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser
Hi,

I have approved you for AutoWikiBrowser. You can download it from here. Good luck!  jj137  ♠ 18:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Infoboxes via AWB
Before you get going to far, I wanted to let you know that the infobox is supposed to go before all article content (with the exception of tags or disambig links). Right now you seem to be adding them after the lead paragraph, which is incorrect. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 17:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I fixed Jason Graae if you want to see what I mean. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 17:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

&mdash;I was following one of the guidelines for formatting biographical articles (can't remember which one offhand) that suggested the infobox should appear after the introduction if possible and only in the upper right as a last resort. So I have been placing it in the upper right for very short articles, and after 1-2 paragraphs if there is a suitable amount of material, mostly making an esthetic judgement on how it appears best. Leofric1 (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Point taken, I do see guidelines to that effect at Manual of Style (infoboxes). I have just never seen a biography article that didn't have the infobox up top! As a matter of fact, I was just choosing featured articles at random, and every one with an infobox I viewed "violates" these guidelines as far as placement goes. WikiProject Biography doesn't seem to have any recommendations that contradict the MOS guidelines, though, so by all means carry on! Thanks for your hard work. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 18:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Linking years
Just letting you know this edit messed up a link in the infobox. And anyway, standalone shouldn't be wikilinked, per the MoS. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 22:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


 * &mdash;Okay, that edit of mine didn't turn out quite right. However, my reading of the MoS seems to suggest that standalone years may be wikilinked according to user preference, but need not be, not that they shouldn't be at all. Leofric1 (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

John Beradino
It had a picture, but someone deleted it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 00:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * &mdash;The bot removed the image tag since the image itself had been deleted, and that in turn was because the image was a "fair use replaceable" image so I figure that whoever deleted it thinks that the fair-use image should be easy enough to find a replacement for. I just tagged the article so that it gets added to the appropriate categories of articles needing images. Used to be I'd add a placeholder image but those are apparently frowned upon these days. Leofric1 (talk)

Image placeholders
I noticed that you have been removing the image Replace this image male on several of the Medal of Honor pages. I was wondering why you where doing that and ask that unless you are intending on putting an actual image then to please stop. Please let me know if you have any questions.--Kumioko (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * &mdash;Per this discussion it has been my understanding that image placeholders are no longer desirable and should not be used on article pages. I have been in the habit of removing such images and instead putting "needs-photo=yes" on the talk page's WPBiography template. Leofric1 (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Its good to put the placeholder on the talk page also but most users when looking at a page do not look at the talk page. Also, this discussion was closed with no consensus so no action should have been taken.--Kumioko (talk) 21:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * &mdash;Obviously there are two camps here not giving an inch and I can't win regardless of whose advice I follow. I put placeholders in, someone takes them out. I take them out&mdash;and here we are. Perhaps I misread the discussion but it seemed the recommendation was not to use them for now. Leofric1 (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstars
i gave you some barnstars. good boy. --88.250.104.129 (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, I've been vandalized! I guess it was pretty obvious since they were cut-and-pasted, dates and all. It's sort of a backhanded compliment in a way, but I prefer the proper sort on the whole. ;) Leofric1 (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Robert Russell (English actor)
Thanks. I am already aware of that. I am planning to run the bot once again to remove Category:Year of birth missing when Category:xxxx births exists and add the Date of birth missing to the talk page. I already did that before. Friendly, Magioladitis (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Lily Mazahery
My intention was to remove the "missing year of birth" tag, which was inaccurate since the article already gave her year of birth. I think I unintentionally removed too much. I'll go look.Bill (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Rudd
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Rudd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Request to unprotect Lily Mazahery
Hi. Given that you have been one of the main contributors and admin of the page for Lily Mazahery, I would like to seek your assistance in getting the edit protection removed from the page so that it can be improved as you have suggested. Thank you.--Kindness55 (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * &mdash;I think perhaps Manime87 is what I consider to be the main (at least initially) contributor to the article. I merely made a couple small tweaks. I created the talk page and made some suggestions for advancing the state if the article.

Change from stub class to start class
In light of the fact that you had provided comments about how the page for Lily Mazahery has been improving and expanding, I thought it might be a good idea to seek your advice about whether this article is now eligible to be classified as more than a stub page? I look forward to your response. Thanks.--Joaj (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Leofric1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Richard Cambridge (U.S. actor) -

You're invited: Spacefest Edit-a-thon Honoring Sally Ride - Tucson, AZ
--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 16:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Leofric1! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  19:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)