User talk:Leon Cold

June 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bacterial pneumonia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 14:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Bacterial pneumonia. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bacterial pneumonia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please use sources that are reliable per WP:RS. Source that you provided are not reliable.'' SunDawn (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Bacterial pneumonia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Please also remember that only 3 reverts/changes are allowed per user in 24 hours. Reverting/changing about this will violate this rule.'' SunDawn (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)