User talk:Leonard60

When it comes to breast implant, the neutral links should be the ones at the top. After all, they are the most likely to be informative. Some articles even have seperate sections for "pro" and "anti" links.

Please familiarise yourself with WP:NPOV and Raul's Razor. It saves time. JFW | T@lk  21:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Your pushing of the NOW link suggests you are not up-to-date with NPOV. Anycase, I didn't place any link anywhere. All I did was undo your edits, because I disagreed with your actions. You may wish to follow up my idea of seperating the "pro" and "anti" links for greater clarity. JFW | T@lk  21:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The alternate pushing of Manhattan Institute and Enterprise Institute links shows an equal POV. Therefore, this comment of JFW is nonsensical.  Political links, of either stripe, are POV.  Therefore, to suggest that one which you agree with is not POV but one you disagree with is POV is utterly absurd.Leonard60 04:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I do not think you can separate this easily into 'pro' and 'con' with the studies, because they are often misquoted...As to Fumento Libertarian article, that is clearly a 'pro'. Alliance for Justice and NOW are clearly 'con'.  Perhaps those should be separated.

As for WP:RAUL - this list is maintained by User:Raul654, one of the nestors of Wikipedia. I've added my own wisdom, but obviously Raul's Razor is not by me. Try not to be so paranoid. JFW | T@lk  21:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Jfdwolfff needs to review WP:CIVIL. The Alliance has been re-added, and appropriate identification of right-wing political groups has also been added.Leonard60 04:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)