User talk:Leonard Peikoff

Rationale as one may be, one must demonstrate knowledge of Wikipedia policies before becoming an admin. Sorry to say, self nomming with a handful of edits does the opposite. Suggest withdrawal. Dloh cierekim'''  20:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Why am I blocked?
Why am I blocked? I didn't do anything wrong. Am I only blocked because I requested adminship for myself? Leonard Peikoff 20:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Your edits for today suggest that you are only seeking to disrupt Wikipedia. I'm not the blocking admin, but I would have a hard time figuring out a reason to unblock. Dloh cierekim'''  20:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, so Wikipedia is irrational and has blocked Ayn Rand's intellectual heir. I'll just put out a press release informing all Objectivists to stay away from Wikipedia. Leonard Peikoff 20:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you continue to use this talk page to disrupt Wikipedia, it will be protected against editing. Please stop while you are ahead. Recreating the same deleted RFA twice not only demonstrates sufficient lack of understanding about Wikipedia to make the outcome of such an RFA certain as unsuccessful, it also could be construed as vandalism.  Dloh cierekim'''  20:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

Leonard Peikoff
Howdy, please note that the Username policy forbids the use of a famous name as a username, unless the user can be verified to be that person. If you in fact are Leonard Peikoff, send us a note using the Contact us methods. Thanks for the interest in the project. --TeaDrinker 21:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)