User talk:Leonardollockett

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The EOG Collections: So Was It Worth The Price He Paid?, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The EOG Collections: So Was It Worth The Price He Paid? was changed by Leonardollockett (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-17T03:48:05+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

STOP moving the article at Articles for Deletion. You are really mucking up the process and it's completely non-constructive. Somno (talk) 03:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, now JUST LEAVE THE ARTICLE WHERE IT IS until the Articles for Deletion process is complete. If the article is kept, you can then move it to another title if it's still incorrect. Somno (talk) 03:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * If you would like to edit the article about your book, edit The EOG Collections:. Leave everything else as a redirect, and do not move the article. Somno (talk) 04:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. JNW (talk) 04:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''Repeated moving of your book's page to evade detection is inappropriate and will not be permitted. Please stop.'' TravellingCari  21:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Elements of God Collections: Enemies of God Series Vol 1 So Was It Worth The Price He Paid?
A tag has been placed on Elements of God Collections: Enemies of God Series Vol 1 So Was It Worth The Price He Paid?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Largo Plazo (talk) 15:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. ''THis is your final warning. Any repeated posting of the article on your book will result in blocking. YOu have been warned appropriately on many occasions and repeated moving of the article to evade deletion is disruptive.'' TravellingCari  15:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Elements of God Collections: Enemies of God Series Vol 1 So Was It Worth The Price He Paid?
A tag has been placed on Elements of God Collections: Enemies of God Series Vol 1 So Was It Worth The Price He Paid?, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Pip (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. ''Now that I tagged this article I realized it was a.) not the first time you've created it and b.) your book. CSD & COI'' Pip (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * I have blocked you indefinitely because your contributions show that your sole purpose for using wikipedia is the promotion of your book, which has been deleted numerous times. Your attempts to move the page to avoid deletion do not help your cause or prevent the book from being deleted. TravellingCari  16:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:The Elements of God web cover 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Elements of God web cover 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)