User talk:Leoortiz~enwiki

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. FreplySpang 00:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neoxica
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Neoxica, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * neologism, WP not a dictionary / possibly hoax

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 11:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I am the Creator of this neologism, it clearly refers to the immigration phenomenon concerning to the people of Mexico, i do not agree on deleting this page, because the study of the Neoxica phenomenon is in progress, the word is as new as the new massive Mexican immigration. Is not cited on any book jet, so there are no current previous reference. It is proper that Wikipedia carried this word, so It's Avangard Characteristic confirm validity.

OK, knock it off now
Mr Ortiz, please do not get into an edit war over this. We have Neoxica on our watchlists so we know whenever you make a change, and if you continue to violate the rules you will be blocked for disruptive editing. If there are no available references for the phenomenon you will simply have to accept that Wikipedia cannot publish an article on it. There are many places that would be happy to have your research, I suggest you take it there. Thank you. Hadrian89 (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Neoxica
I have nominated Neoxica, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Neoxica&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Passportguy (talk) 10:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Passportguy, when Passportguy born, there was not an available references.

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Leoortiz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Leoortiz~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)