User talk:LeottaPaola/sandbox

Ola!Raffaele Piscopo (talk) 17:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello Paola, was just passing and reading your topic, although I know you are still working on it, I would encourage you to write in a more simple and easy language type, remind that "it should be like you are explaining it to someone" however, if it's complicated to unfold the genetics in a simple language I would advice you to include links along your text, to facilitate the readers to understand the meaning of some of the jargon. And the article overall. --D&#39;Catarina (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)D'Catarina

It would be very interesting if you could associate the genomics achievements with their ecological role, in other words: what does the genome tell us regarding their function or potential function in the environment, try to connect it with some ecology, or also understand their marine significance. You can also include general aspects regarding their ecology, where they can be found, metabolic strategies, potential threats for this microbe. Keep going Paula! --D&#39;Catarina (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)D'Catarina

Hi Nilza ,I’ve read your suggestions but i try to explain in short steps : "try to connect it with some ecology, or also understand their marine significance" -the ecological aspect cannot be included,it is a subject of Flavia.Can’t connect everything to ecology! -Raffaele will talk about metabolism. -Sulfolobus thrive in volcanic hot springs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeottaPaola (talk • contribs) 17:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Paola! I’ve been checking your sandbox and I think you should try to adjust the form of your work. Probably just going on the next line instead of writing a unique block could help to make it look more spacious and to stay focused on the reading. Also, I think that you should add more references, it could be useful to have a direct link to the information you’re adding, especially when they are so specific. Remember that solfataricus should not present the capital letter, and the whole name should be in italic. You should also pay attention to some little errors in the writing, like the “e” missing in “representativeness”. Hope this could help, good work! --Ottaviaiac (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Paola, I suggest you to adjust the form of your article and to add more information, if you can. For the rest, is ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierangelo Ferrara (talk • contribs) 15:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi guys, I am still reading articles ,there is much information to add.Thank you for your suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeottaPaola (talk • contribs) 16:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Paola, I read your article and I invite you to pay attention to some typos and to add some references. Overall the article is fine and clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariacristina D Ascoli (talk • contribs) 20:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Paola. Well done. You did a big improvement. You should fix your "red" references. I had the same problem. Click on the help page or edit references section to fix. FabyRockPhoto (talk) 11:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Great ,thank you for your suggestion.I do it right away — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeottaPaola (talk • contribs) 13:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)