User talk:Lepamahali

Welcome!


Hello, Lepamahali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Crboyer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2016 in film have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crboyer (talk) 07:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bollywood films of 2016. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bollywood films of 2016, you may be blocked from editing. Crboyer (talk) 07:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please leave edit summaries and use preview
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bollywood films of 2016. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of Bollywood films of 2016 was changed by Lepamahali (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899612 on 2017-01-12T09:50:36+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Various tables at List of Bollywood films of 2016 and List of Bollywood films of 2015
Hi there, I've removed the various tables you've recently added to List of Bollywood films of 2016 and List of Bollywood films of 2015. If you think these tables belong at these articles, you should seek consensus on the talk pages of each article. Presently, the scope of these list articles seems to be only to indicate what films were released in these years. I have other concerns with these tables: If you have any comments, please feel free to respond below, or to the discussion that has already been opened at Talk:List of Bollywood films of 2015. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) They're largely unsourced. Though I do see a source or two, for instance at the top of the page which points to Box Office Mojo, I notice that Shivaay isn't on Box Office Mojo's list, which leads me to wonder where you got that financial data, and why that reference isn't on the list. Also, Box Office Mojo's figures are in US dollars. Where did the rupee conversions come from? If I spot check the worldwide gross for Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, I see $28.4 million at BOM, and when I run that through various currency calculators, I get ₹193 crore, not the 237.56 crore you have listed in the table. That's like a 21% difference. And when I run M. S. Dhoni's $27.8 million, I get 189.5 crore, not the 215.48 crore you indicated in the table. What gives?
 * 2) The "verdict" column is completely inappropriate for inclusion. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a movie fan website. We don't take opinions using meaningless subjective labels like "all time blockbuster", "super hit", etc. and present these opinions as incontrovertible facts. Encyclopedias are written from a neutral point of view and we use neutral tone. We don't celebrate a film's success by "declaring" it an "all time blockbuster". When Rotten Tomatoes decides that a film's overall critical response was poor, we don't prominently say "the film was declared rotten". That's completely the wrong tone for an encyclopedia to take. We instead present the objective data like what you'll find at Mad Max: Fury Road. Please avoid these arbitrary labels.
 * 3) I also don't know what to make of the "Successful films" column. The scope of List of Bollywood films of 2016 is very obviously Bollywood films of 2016, yet you've included Captain America: Civil War and The Conjuring 2? Why? And why do we have a list of Successful films when we already have a list of the most successful films right above it? I also don't know how Detective Byomkesh Bakshy! a film that you've labeled as "average" is being included in a list of "Successful" films. The table seems like a needless and arbitrary extension of the table that appears directly above it, and I don't think it belongs in these "List of Bollywood movies" article.

March 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Telugu films of 2017 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of Bollywood films of 2017. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Uncle Roy (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Based on the above, it appears to me that you're only here to fabricate data and make a mess. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Here you change the gross for Raees from 304 to 290.45 when the existing source clearly indicates 304 crore.
 * Here you changed the gross of Badrinath Ki Dulhania from 191.62 crore to 200.61 crore, despite this source clearly indicating 191.62.
 * Here you've changed the gross of Jolly LLB 2 from 197.25 to 200.64 crore when the source says clearly 197.33 crore.
 * Here you changed the gross of Kaabil from 147.52 crore to 209.50, despite the source indicating not only a gross of 147.52, but that Kaabil "fails to cross 200-crore".
 * Here you inexplicably remove reference formatting, sloppily convert repeated references back to individual references, you add color formatting without bothering to provide a key to the reader so they know what the color means, etc.