User talk:Lerdthenerd/Archive 2

User page semied
I just semi-protected your userpage -- can't think of any reason an anon user should have to edit that.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, i don't know why they do it, boredom maybe?-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  17:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Civil?
I've just noticed your comment:
 * Thanks Bilcat, but they are edit warring over it, Pdfpdf claims to be in bed now, but the edit war as gone on sice as late as 1 pm today where I am--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 14:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I suppose that you realise that by saying "Pdfpdf claims to be in bed now" you are implying that I'm lying? You have zero evidence to support that assertion, particularly given it was the early hours of the morning where I live, and the next day was a work-day. Please choose your words more judiciously, and if you are going to make such claims, please provide supporting evidence. (And yes, it is 4am here, but "tomorrow" is Sunday.) Pdfpdf (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * sorry if that sounded rude, but it was a bit of a coincidence that logged off after I stepped in, the incident with Delta has been dealt with, those images you were trying to put into the article were NFCC violations. Sorry if it sounded like I didn't believe you-- Lerd the nerd  wiki defender  09:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 12:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Yay!! thanks Dabomb! -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Jonny "Jon" Keogh
This is not the proper tag for this type of problem. The author has copied material from the List of Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps characters article. Rather than propose the new article for deletion to make way for a page move (which is not going to happen), it would be better to revert the deletion of material at the source article (which has been done) and to change this new page to a redirect to the original. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * ok thanks, I'll make sure to do that next time -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Avoidant Personality Disorder - YouTube External Link
Hello,

Just a quick question. You removed the external link I provided on the AvPD webpage to this youtube clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ7qYH4ud4U asserting that it is under copyright. This seems highly unlikely to me?

You also said it can't be used anyway, presumably because it is not a source that represents an "authority" on the matter. However, the link specifically states that it provides a first-person, subjective or phenomenological account of AvPD. Inherently, an authority on such an experience is a person with that diagnosis. It's inclusion is merited due to the fact that subjective accounts of such conditions differ from objective categorial entries from diagnosticians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiachraByrne (talk • contribs) 13:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit: I've opened a discussion topic in the Talk:Avoidant personality disorder page if you'd prefer to answer there.FiachraByrne (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I've posted another reply to you in Talk:Avoidant personality disorder. Just to reiterate, there's no blanket ban on the use of YouTube as an external link. In this instance, there's no issue of copyright and not all YouTube videos are under copyright. In terms of authority, as I've stated above, this video, which I'd encourage you to watch, was specifically designated as providing a first-person narrative of the condition. No-one else but a sufferer could be an authority in that regard. It informs the objective and clinical information in the general article but is not a source for any of that information. FiachraByrne (talk) 12:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Wyatt Miller Deletion
Wyatt Miller is a character in star trek. google "wyatt miller star trek" is you dont believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr ArticleEditor (talk • contribs) 10:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * really? why is the article written as if its about a real person, i thought someone was having a laugh the way it was written-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * your right but he is a minor character not notable to have his own article-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Wyatt Mill
Please Therefore Move it to the page for minor characters. you have my permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr ArticleEditor (talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * it has already been redirected by another user-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Lerd! :)
Thanks Lerd. Much Appreciated. All the best from Norway. Nunamiut Nunamiut (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

no problem! :) -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

What happened to the ANI thread?
About User:Dox1donny? --Shirt58 (talk) 08:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I collapsed a large amount of text from Dox1donny because it was just a rehash of the content dispute. AFAIK it's still active. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 08:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you. User:Dox1donny has now been indef'ed. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * well that'll solve the edit war, shame to see him go though, thats what he deserved-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Adam-George Edward Gallant Farnell
Hi. Just to let you know I have deleted this as CSD A3 because it has a link in it. If you have a moment  do  check out WP:NPP an WP:CSD. You might  like to  consider using  WP:Twinkle because it offers a dropdown menu of all  the CSD types with  description, and automatically  notifies the creator. It saves a lot of work if used carefully. --Kudpung (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, by the way Kudpung that articles is being continually created, i dont think the author is getting the message.-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  11:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Zajdi zajdi sonce song edit
Pjesma Zajdi zajdi sonce, Local User don't revert my edits to this songs history, couse claims that Aleksandar Sarievski composed it are [false]!!!!!! Aleksandar was Macedonian traditional music - folk singer and thats it, he was not composer nor song writer and { Zajdi zajdi song } is ancient and at least 500 years old. Im guessing Mr. Sarievski lived 500+ years Please don't make Macedonian history based on lies and fiction. I lived in SFRJ long enough to know what is what and who is who.--70.130.144.54 (talk) 10:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

thank you for responding but explain your reasons on the article's talk page so the other users may take part in the discussion, there was no real need to edit war in the first place-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

song zajdi ajdi sonce
Song Zajdi zajdi sonce, please don't revert my edits to this songs history, couse claims that Aleksandar Sarievski composed it are [false]!!!!!! Aleksandar was Macedonian traditional music - folk singer and thats it, he was not composer nor song writer and { Zajdi zajdi song } is ancient and at least 500 years old. Im guessing Mr. Sarievski lived 500+ years Please don't make Macedonian history based on lies and fiction. I lived in SFRJ long enough to know what is what and who is who.--70.130.144.54 (talk) 10:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * you just reverted me for no reason! use the articles talk page and start using edit summaries, you've been warned already for edit warring but you continued to revert, and please stop posting the same message on my talk page its spamming-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

RE: Song zajdi zajdi
I explained in my message to you, Aleksandar Sarievski(1922-2002) was only Folk song singer and he can't compose or write something that is 500 years old {absurd} This is Macedonia root song, just like Chinese, Black American, Indian, Egypt etc. Root Song/folk song and it belongs to the people and not to Mr. Sarievski. Composer and writer is unknown--70.130.144.54 (talk) 11:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * thank you but you should have gained consensus on the talk page not edit warred-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  11:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Re song zajdi zajdi edit
You can LMAO or Not, but the thing is i can't allow teens to write history they don't know about.--70.130.144.54 (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.144.54 (talk) 12:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

lol im not a teen, i just talk like that on wikipedia and sign you posts please!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

re:re: song zajdi zajdi
why don't we say that for example Lincoln was Black, or Hitler was from Uganda or B.B. king was in fact Elvis, Beatles Chinese Band and so on ......--70.130.144.54 (talk) 12:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

that has nothing to do with the argument, you insist on changing the author wrote and composed to the author recorded, when there is large consensus against you, gain consensus and stop edit warring-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  13:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Concensus
Concensus consists of 3 people who are against it (my edit) please give solid prof thet Aleksandar Sarievski composed and wrote this song, you cant because musical score/arrangements for this song made Orchestra of Radio Television Serbia (Yugoslavia) back in 1950's based on version played, sung on weddings, taverns, street...etc. song is tranfered from generation to genaration--70.130.144.54 (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * first off stop reverting and give sources stating why Alek did not compose the song, if you continue to revert people you will be blocked-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

R.e. my talk
It is probably a good idea not to get involved. Some bad things were said, and a ruckus ensued. With luck it will die down if no one else brings it back to the fore.

Unfortunately Blofeld did say some things which, while I am not sure were intended in quite the way the were taken, was inappropriate, childish and totally over the line. --Errant (chat!) 13:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I found the 'bum chum' remark but nothing on calling people 'illiterate Spainards', its still partially lies, I know Blofield can occasionly lose it (i had to step in when he personal attacked another user), but Blofeld is like a mate on here and i wont have people upset him but i will step back for a moment-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  13:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Beat me to the punch
I was on my way to AIV when I realized the warnings were out of order. :P anyway, happy hunting :) .   Mlpearc   powwow  11:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * lol that was fast, normally people are able spot vandalism that obvious and revert before I get to-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

AFD
Can you please paraphrase my comment and re post it? consider it a lesson learned. Thanks in advance, B. Beresford 77 (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


 * only if you learn how to be civil and not be so rude to TreasuryTag, I read your comment there is no need to call him a f**%$£g jackass and the edit summary was rude aswell.-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  13:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

FYI
Block templates are optional, especially when blocking someone who knows what a block is. There's no good reason to ever use one on a bot's talk page, for instance. Courcelles 22:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


 * ok i suppose its because they can't appeal to being blocked, they're robots after all, feel free to remove the template-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Editwar on FPC
Im not trying to initiate an editwar. I just splited the voting and discussion section. Any reason to no do this, or why this should be forbidden? --Niabot (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * nothing wrong with that, but you are edit warring with multiple editors please stop-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Just some users that are sabotaging a fair voting. And now I'm the bad guy. Compliments and best wishes from --Niabot (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * your not the bad guy, but you should know not to edit war by now-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Does it change the fact that one or two guys try to sabotage a nomination with useless comments? In a comment section they could write what they want, without spamming the page with more or less unreleated comments, which have less to do with actual voting progress. --Niabot (talk) 12:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

discussions such as FPC's and AFD's aren't just for voting they are for commenting on the rational behind each contributors votes, this is not simply an election-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I accept that. But i don't accept discussions which aren't related to image itself inside the consensus procedure, disturbing everyone with 100m of text with nothing closely related to the actual image anymore. --Niabot (talk) 12:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * well remind people not to soap box, if they continue then you may revert but use an edit summary like 'stick to the discussion please, no soap boxing'-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Template:Geographic refimprove
I know that the AfD message shouldn't normally go on a template, but the template places it on the 2500 articles which are up for AfD (check the AfD link to see what I am talking about). The red box on the template doesn't hurt anyone, and it is by far the easiest way of producing the AfD messages. Fram (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * ok I see. Wow 2500 articles thats a lot of work Fram, good luck!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  09:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Fram (talk) 09:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

On Sodabottle
This editor is playing a propaganda bully and tries to ban whoever who edits Chera Dynasty and Kongu Nadu. He is r Ravichaeal prof. is Ravichandar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.107.58 (talk) 09:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * yes but you also reverted the Cluebot whose job it is to patroll for possible vandalism why did you revert it for no reason?-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  09:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reverting him .This is the indef blocked sockmaster and pov pusher PONDHEEPANKAR. per WP:DENY dont talk to him, just revert without pause. This ip range was blocked for a week and it expired yesterday. So he is back to his old activities. Just revert him and ignore him. i have asked for an extension of the range block and we will be rid of him a few more weeks--Sodabottle (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

ok-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have filed an AIV report too. I think that will be acted upon quicker--Sodabottle (talk) 09:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

ok thanks-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  09:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive update
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

DaoTerrorist184
Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my page. I guess he didn't appreciate my Mozi quote. PeRshGo (talk) 08:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * no problem :)-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  08:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Degen Earthfast
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my page. --Degen Earthfast (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * no problem-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  17:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

problem
hello,

i am cyperus and i am writer on wikipedia since many time now. i am kickboxing writer, i update stats and events.

an user is laughing of my work, this is not possible. i will not write anymore on wikipedia because of him! :((

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperKombat_World_Grand_Prix_I (here is the article; viewed by many, sourced and notable, one of the biggest promotions or second from Europe after It's Showtime)

and this is the user: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23

please help me! he doesnt respect my work! i am so sad... thank you! ps. sorry for writing here


 * your removing the AFD tag its against the rules!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  20:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank for you comment
thank for your comment. could you please not banned me because i am trying to say sorry to him ok. if him say forgive to me I will leave him alone from that a deal Archiveman2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archiveman2011 (talk • contribs) 09:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * ok try to sort things out at the ANI thread and please sign your posts-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  09:13, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your revert
Can you explain this? And a edit of a sysop has never had more value than a well sourced edit (in this case two sources). I see your behavior here as vandalism, and don´t want to use my tools here as there are more than enough sysops around, so would you please rollback it by your self? Thanks in advance. --WizardOfOz (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

that edit was spilling into an edit war, i politely asked why they were continually reverting kwagamki (is that how its spelt?) if you read the later history you'll see they were still reverting kwagamki, so therefore if anything im not a vandal the users persistanly arguing with an admin like kwagamki are!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  18:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Kalitta routes
Why you are calling my edits Vandalism and Unconstructive??? I have updated their destinations with new reference. 119.155.38.131 (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * because you reverted the cluebot, sorry but if you're edits are sensible then complain to cluebots owner, its acting up again sorry-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

140.254.227.179
FYI. Long-term pattern abuser. See this entry, just by way of example. Any help in dealing with him would be appreciated - JohnInDC (talk) 21:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, seems he has a problem with Jews based on his edits, I just reverted and warned him best not respond to his taunts-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  21:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, the taunts are just silly. It's his edits.  Several pages wound up semi-protected back in March as a result of his busy-ness; probably that's what will have to happen again.  He appears to edit from public terminals at Ohio State, and there is surely a limitless supply of them!  JohnInDC (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * they all appear to be 140.254, we should keep an eye out for those IPs and maybe a rangeblock is needed-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  21:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I actually made a list of his IPs last time around - I may go fish it up. JohnInDC (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, John. The taunts are meant to be silly. Heck, most of my edits are meant to be silly. I don't believe all that anti-Semitic crap---my only abnormal belief about Jews is that they may have an easier time getting jobs in media and entertainment than the rest of us, due to connections, not any grand conspiracy. I certainly don't hate them. I'm more trolling than anything else---and as for the Rugrats-related stuff, go watch a "Drew Pickles goes to..." video on YouTube and you'll understand where I'm coming from. I'm trying to be entertaining and a little bit frustrating, but mostly entertaining. As such, I'm laying off the Jewish stuff. I'm sure you'll continue to revert my vandalism and block me, but at least try to see the humor in the edits' content. Don't let yourselves get stressed out over it---have a laugh at my expense! 140.254.227.55 (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * also you were socking 140.254, regardless if you were joking your behaviour cannot be condoned-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, well, you also said on my Talk page that you were done with your vandalism so I am not sure I can credit even your "all in good fun" defense at this point - JohnInDC (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * hey, John he just vandalised Rugrats again and i reverted him-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I visited AIV. JohnInDC (talk) 15:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks John-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  15:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course I'm sockpuppeting. Isn't that what public terminals are for? Besides, Lerd, I'm not arguing with your assertion that my "behaviour cannot be condoned" (per Wikipedia standards), although I'd appreciate if you'd make it sound less like a crime and more like...well, not a crime, just going against Wikipedia standards. I know it's not constructive, but it's at least a little bit humorous, and it helps me blow off a bit of steam. I'm trying to cut back because I'm aware it doesn't help me much---there are more constructive and less annoying ways of blowing off steam---and also because I want to put more focus on making useful edits on my legit account (that's right, I'm an editor). I'm really not a destructive person by nature, and I don't want this behavior to serve as a gateway to more overtly antisocial behavior. Old habits die hard, though. I would ask that you not do a blanket IP block, if only because hundreds or possibly thousands of other students use these same computers.140.254.227.197 (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't care if you want to have a laugh, this is not the place, go to Uncyclopedia and goof off there!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Meh. Uncyclopedia isn't my thing. Cracked, maybe; I'd love to write for them. 140.254.227.197 (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * just stop mucking about on here ok, its annoying for me to revert you as it is for you when you get blocked-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Trial graphics
Hello Lerdthenerd. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Trial graphics, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to products. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ok-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Just for you...

 * thanks! that means a lot to me-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  20:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I second the above. You deserve it. Keep up the fantastic work you're doing :) Mr Little Irish  (talk) 申 10:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * thank you too-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  20:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm not insulting anyone's religion.
It's a fact that Jewish editors are the ones who revert any reference toe the word "captured" in regards to Gilad Shalit. --68.45.180.34 (talk) 16:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * so what if they're Jewish it shouldn't matter try to remain civil-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please try to use question marks and periods in sentences. Thank you.--68.45.180.34 (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

As you can see in the Republic of Kosovo page, I opened a talk page discussion which no one bothered responding to. The other two users are actually engaging in an 'edit war.' My new lead is in conformity with wikipedia standards. Please feel free to have a look at the previous version and compare it to mine. Ottomanist (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * you do realise this is a 1RR article neither of you should have gone past your first revert-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Yay! thankyou!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I know, I sent a report first Jasper XD!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  06:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

OE talk page vandalism
please read the comments and also please advise.PlanDenied (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * its a talk page people are allowed to talk there!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  21:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * so it's a page that doesn't follow normal wiki policy on page vandalism, libel and slander? PlanDenied (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Username issue
User:Redknappslovechild, I believe refers to love child, not what you implied in the notice on their talk page - either way though, it's a policy violation. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * thanks-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  18:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Why, hello!
Hi, old friend! Haven't come across you in a long time! Nice to see you again. Drew Pickles&#39; Enormous Member (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * hello who is that?? -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Um, yeah...
...what the name says. Stopcensoringme (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Drew leave my page alone! X( -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  20:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Username templates
Hi. I've noticed that you have templated some users with problematic usernames. It's appreciated, for real. The only thing I'd say is just to remember that the entire purpose of those templates is to inform people that there is a problem when they likely do not know the name is a problem. You tagged one name recently that was pretty offensive - the user no doubt knew the name was inappropriate so you didn't have to inform him that it was - next time, just report those directly to WP:UAA - but only if it's obvious, remember. The other thing I'd say again is to remember that the templates are about communicating things to people, so you've got to make the templates output things in complete sentences. For example, in this edit, you wrote "may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because unambigous advertising". You need a few more words in there to have it make sense. And I would add, in that particular case, unless I've missed something, that the name is not actually unambiguous advertising as you say it is because there are no edits or surrounding evidence to tie it to a company or anything promotional. That does not mean you can't use the template, because you may in the end have been right, but I would have avoided the word 'unambiguous' because it wasn't unambiguous at that point. Hope this helps. NTox · talk 20:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * thanks, i'll take your advise-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Otaxige
Just letting you know i have reported this user. He will be blocked very soon! --JetBlast (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Lol we warned at the same time! XD! thanks-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  11:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Cerebrum
So it means I am a vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckydhaliwal (talk • contribs) 19:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * no, but dont call experienced users vandals please instead explain why you disagree-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

But why should he revert my work when it is correct. He often reverts my editing and earlier with great difficulty I explained him how he was wrong and then he accepted that he was wrong and reverted my edits. But i cannot explain him everytime. This does not mean that if he is a admin he is always right and other editors are wrong. Simply writing that earlier was better is not sufficient, he should explain why earlier was better.Luckydhaliwal (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree but retorting 'No this is better' isn't helping-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  10:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * First, neither of us are a vandal. That word has an extremely specific meaning on Wikipedia. You can read the details at WP:VANDAL, but the summary is that vandalism means deliberately harming Wikipedia, like writing, "The cerebrum is made of dog crap. BOORRING!" However, even though neither of our edits are vandalism, it can still mean that edits are wrong. Your versions on those scientific articles are harder to understand at best, and, at worst, outright wrong. I can explain exactly why in each case they are wrong, if you would like. But, for instance, this edit at Cerebrum is flat out wrong. Your first statement, "consists of two approximately symmetric left and right cerebral hemispheres", means that there are two left and two right hemispheres. Second, that's not even the right definition--the correct definition is in the one before you changed it. Third, "cranial" means "of or pertaining to the cranium  or skull," so you can't be "most cranial". This is the problem with most of your edits--I think that your knowledge of English is simply insufficient in most cases, because your changes just don't make sense.  However, I am willing to give you point by point explanations of each of the changes if you like. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * hellllooo! your on my talk page! XD -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  11:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Roger Rae
Hi Lerdthenerd,

I changed the text back because the original version made better sense - the phrasing suggesting that the stories about Roger's youth may have just been stories. That was part of his character - he was renown for being a great storyteller.

As it is now, the punctuation isn't right and it loses the 'was it really true' quality. If your objective is to make the posting more factual that objective has not been met - it would have been better to cut that sentence out.

The other thing is, his family have read and approved of the original version, and it has been put together by someone who actually knew him.

I'm not quite sure why somebody who seems to not be particularly interested in jazz or having any personal connection would want to alter it - but your prompt removal of my alteration suggests that it's important to you - so I'll bow to your greater IT skill and let you get on with it.

Anyone with any personal knowledge of Roger Rae will know that as it stands it's wrong - but hey - what do we know...

Englishmajor45 (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

what was with the commentary afterwards, if you're gonna edit articles don't add commentary to article space-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  12:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Thank you for your report at Usernames for administrator attention (UAA). However, your report was removed as UAA is for username policy infringements that are serious enough to warrant an immediate block. General name policy violations should first be discussed with the user on their talk page. A helpful template to do just that is. Note that a request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. You may find the UAA instructions helpful, and I'd recommend reading them over prior to making future reports to UAA. Thank you. ''You may want to review the comments for your submissions at WP:UAA for clarification. Several of your submissions appear not to meet UAA guidelines.'' - Vianello (Talk) 02:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Gee thanks, I'm still getting my head round UAA-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  08:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * All the reports pages are kind of their own animal, with their own little fine points and technicalities. Everyone who regularly reports to any of 'em gets reports shot down sometimes. If you have any questions on any specific points, please feel free to ask! - Vianello (Talk) 00:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * thanks-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  07:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Ahem
That was quick—I'm very impressed. In case you hadn't noticed, however, that's a page for running tests, and I'm trying to run tests on it. Please don't revert the PC testing pages, at least not in the next hour or so, okay? Thanks much! Rivertorch (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

oh crud sorry-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  08:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * LOL. It's quite all right—I can do it over again. I was genuinely impressed at how quickly you got there and correctly identified the problem. Rivertorch (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  08:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Captain Underpants AFD
Because you participated in Articles for deletion/Captain Underpants and the Preposterous Plight of the Purple Potty People you might want to participate in Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Captain Underpants. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 01:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Read the Reference
...before you revert. Probably one of the most famous Sikh fictional charachters. Look here. BTW there is a huge white Sikh community in America. S H 17:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Wow didn't know Khan was sikh!-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  17:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Just been watching a re-run today. It makes sense because Sikhs were formidable warriors. They're about 2% of the population and under the British made up 50% of the armed forces. Nowadays they make up around 30%. They disproportiately won a huge amount of bravery medals. I think 5 Victoria Crosses. All that for around 20 million people. S H 17:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I heard its pretty good (among trekkies!) particuly the bit when Kirk screams 'KHHHHHAAAAAANN!'-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  17:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, I prefer it when Sheldon does it on the Big Bang Theory. Classic S H 17:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * lulz, by the way mcGeddon seems to disgree that he's a sikh, sinse im not a trekkie I'll let the experts discuss it-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  17:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Fake warnings
Why was it that you gave a 3RR warning to me? Do you even know what 3RR means? And btw, where is the edit war in the first place? Go through the article history before you try to warn anyone, and yeah WP:DTTR of course. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 18:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And since you mentioned on your userpage, here it is: Face-tongue.svg

&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 18:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And FYI, the issue was discussed on several talk pages and Superfast was asked not to add those images, but still continues to do so. So please do some homework before you warn any editor. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 18:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

A longstanding edit war over a week is still an edit war, the history of the article you worked on yesterday just consists of reverts between you and superfast i think that makes an edit war regardless if he was the disruptive one. also thanks for the trout yum! (goes to cut down the mightiest tree in the forest)-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  18:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Abhishek191288
Hello, I understand that you are concerned about repeated editing by Abishek & myself. I have repeatedly tried to reason out with him & even discuss something else with him so that we can understand each other & work backwards but nothing has come out of it except his repeated threats. His contributions on the images has been close to ZERO. He adds nothing to the article but is 1st in line to remove images uploaded by me.

I have repeadtly tried to work it out with him but as nothing has come out of it & in view of his threats, i intend to move for blocking him from editing. Superfast1111 (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * He seems to think you're the disruptive one Super-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  18:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Its good to know that Abhishek is doing some thinking. He is making a sorry attempt to glorify himself as some sort of expert whereas the fact remains that he has little or no factual information and can't understand it if someone explains it to him. What he has completely omitted to say is that there are several others who have undone his edits of my work also. There is a line between opinions & facts. He does not seem to know what it is. He has no images to add but wants to go around removing what others have uploaded. One particular editor has even stated that perhaps Abhishek is jealous of the fact that others have been adding images & he has zero images to add.

I can hardly be blamed for travelling extensively on Indian Railways having made several trips & taking lots of images or being passionate about Indian Railways. I simply say that if he feels my images are not relevant, let us see him uploading images of relevance but nothing so far. And ofcourse his constant threats of blocking me from editing on wikipedia have not helped either. He continues to edit without thinking what he is doing.

Question for you: How does one go about preventing or blocking others from editing on wikipedia? There is another gentleman Tiderolls who i have been in touch with regarding Abhishek's disruptive editing. Maybe you can have a word with him. Superfast1111 (talk) 10:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * only admins can block, so you'll have to ask Tide, I'm not an admin-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  13:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ekab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)