User talk:Lescandinave

You must not write information with intent to misinform, defame or deceive.
You must not write information with intent to misinform, defame or deceive.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects.

| 19th of April Movement: Difference between revisions -> Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information that is spread in a calculated way to deceive target audiences.

|Álvaro Uribe: Difference between revisions ->   potentially libellous.

--Featured2000 (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The Colombian press also spoke about it : http://www.semana.com/on-line/articulo/la-historia-detras-del-documento-inteligencia-acuso-uribe/67329-3

--Lescandinave (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) We could talk about your issues if you cease to threaten or accuse others. --Featured2000 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

You should place these new references in the article about Uribe and place reliable references about the ideology of the M-19. --Featured2000 (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

'''I'm helping. I just put the source''' - http://www.semana.com/on-line/articulo/la-historia-detras-del-documento-inteligencia-acuso-uribe/67329-3 --Featured2000 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright warning
Your addition to Politics of Fidel Castro has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Closing your AN3 report
Thanks for your report at the edit warring noticeboard which I've now closed. Please be aware that World Net Daily is not usually considered a reliable source on Wikipedia -- see the note in my closure statement. 14:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Popular Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. A party whose ideology is simply "conservatism" does not fit far-right politics by itself, you will need to produce secondary and tertiary sources in order to produce such change. B.Lameira (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, Fuerza Popular is for the death penalty, against same sex marriage and against the right to abortion : http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2016/04/11/lo-que-han-dicho-fujimori-y-kuczynski-sobre-5-temas-polemicos-en-peru/.
 * Several secondary sources :
 * "ultraderechista populista Keiko Fujimori" (Semana, http://www.semana.com/opinion/articulo/antonio-caballero-kuczynski-gana-elecciones-en-peru/477191)
 * "extrema derecha populista de Keiko" (El Mundo, http://www.elmundo.es/america/2011/04/14/noticias/1302782249.html)--Lescandinave (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That is subjective, you can place it into right-wing populism, not far-right. --B.Lameira (talk) 22:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kim Il-Sung shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SamaranEmerald (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Bey  WHEELZ   Let   It   RIP!  &#x2709; 📝 02:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

March 2018
Many of the edits made on Ricardo Martinelli's biography are either inaccurate, speculative, or opinion based. I have made edits that are backed up by documentation i.e. Passports, Court Orders, Comptroller Audits, Interpol Reports, etc. Please limit edits to information supported by reputable sources. We can discuss further if need be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.22.19.239 (talk) 01:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Which part of your reversion is supported by The Washington Post? Please undo those that are not. The year of birth is 1952, Martinelli is not on the red alert list for Interpol, Panama's Comptroller Audits show that Martinelli was not involved in the alleged contract to purchase food for schools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.22.19.239 (talk) 03:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Your recent editing history at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti_social_d%27unit%C3%A9_nationale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

May 2018
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pudeo (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)