User talk:Leschnei/Archive 6

Tag a redirect to be made into a disambiguation page?
Hey @Leschnei, I noticed your work with disambiguation pages and I was wondering if you could help me out with something. Is there a category or a tag that can be added to a talk page of a redirect to indicate that a redirect should be turned into a disambiguation page? I'm doing some new page patrolling and came across, which redirects to University of Technology Jaipur because of a page move. There's not currently any valid criteria for me to nominate it for deletion, but it absolutely does not belong as a redirect to one single page. I'd love if I could add pages to a category for users who work on the disambiguation project to expand into pages if one exists. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid that I don't know of any tag for that, though I agree that it would be useful. I've redirected the page to Institute of technology. I'll probably change it to a disambiguation page later. Thanks for calling it to my attention. If you want to pursue the redirect tag, it's possible that someone at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation could tell you if something exists or could be created. It's an active group; most of them are more knowledgeable than me and some can do the programming required (I think). Leschnei (talk) 14:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There's also a bunch of incoming links to University of Technology that have nothing to do with Jaipur. I'll fix those later too! Leschnei (talk) 14:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate you redirecting that, as I wasn't quite sure of the best place, but the new target is great. I'll write something up and ask later because it would be good for me to know for all the times I've come across it. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation
Hi @Leschnei. You reverted my change to the disambiguation page for sybarite. I don't disagree with that, but would welcome your advice on what is the correct way to handle this? Currently, the disambiguation page has no mention of what is the most common use of this word (a person devoted to pleasure and luxury). There is no Wikipedia article on this use of the word (and it probably doesn't require a whole article), so I added it it using a link to Wiktionary. Should I link it to some other WP article such as hedonist, which is not quite the same? Thanks. Masato.harada (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The thing about DAB pages is that they are not about the term being disambiguated (Sybarite in this case), but just a list of Wikipedia articles whose titles need to be distinguished from that term, so definitions are generally not needed. The standard practice is to add a template at the top which puts a link to Wiktionary in the upper right corner (see MOS:WTLINK for more detail). Editors sometimes add a short definition if they think it will help. If you choose to do this, I would suggest leaving out the wikilinks since links to pleasure and luxury really don't help disambiguate titles containing 'Sybarite'. Leschnei (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I see the previous version already had a Wiktionary link in the upper right corner, so I'll just leave it as is. Thanks again. Masato.harada (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * "(Undid revision 1120978056 by AMCKen (talk), no mention in any Wikipedia article - external links aren't used on disambiguation pages)"" - yet I have seen MANY that do not link to a wikipedia article. AMCKen (talk) 04:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree, there are many. There is a lot of confusion and disagreement about DAB pages, which is not surprising since their 'rules' differ from other pages. I try to follow the spirit of the law - make the page as simple and straightforward as possible to help the reader quickly find the article that they want. External links are usually garbage, and those that aren't belong in the article instead. When it seems reasonable, and I can confirm the source, I move them to the article. But there are many, many disambiguation pages, and relatively few editors who work on them. Leschnei (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicotinic acid (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Nicotinic acid (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Dot and two dots
I noticed your edit at three dots. The problem is that dot (disambiguation) redirects to dot; the same arrangement applies to two dots, which explains why I wrote it as I did. Are the articles and their redirects the wrong way round? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * the explanation is at WP:HOWTODAB and MOS:DABSEEALSO - basically all intentional links to disambiguation pages should go through a title that includes '(disambiguation)', whether that's the DAB page itself or a redirect to the DAB page. So Two dots (disambiguation) is correct. The problem with One dot is that (1) it doesn't end in '(disambiguation)' and (2) none of the entries at Dot are titled 'One dot' or '1 dot', so I simply changed it to Dot (disambiguation). Leschnei (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Yes, I read HOWTODAB and more specifically WP:Article titles, but they didn't answer (or at least I didn't find the answer to) the basic question: how should a dab article be named? To put it another way, let's say I need to create a new disambig article for a mythical but very ambiguous topic called !Ooh¡. Should I call it !Ooh¡ (disambiguation), list the many articles about !Ooh¡ in it, and redirect !Ooh¡ to it? Or alternatively do I call it !Ooh¡, list the articles in it, and redirect !Ooh¡ (disambiguation) to it? Or does it matter? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If there is no obvious primary topic, it would probably be best to put the DAB page at !Oohi and create !Ooh¡ (disambiguation) to redirect to it. If someone disagrees, or a topic becomes primary, the DAB page can be moved to !Ooh¡ (disambiguation). !Ooh¡ should never redirect to !Ooh¡ (disambiguation) - that is considered WP:malplaced. Leschnei (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Good, that is what I thought (and did). I'll have a look at WP:Article titles to see if I can make it more evident. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Bluelink works
Thanks for addressing WikiProject Bluelink patrol/Works‎, something I keep meaning to get around to but never find time for. Starting at the bottom gets the job done, but may suggest the least productive tasks to you first. If you mean starting at the bottom of the 0–9 section, I usually start at the top and work down, giving up at some point between 200 and 100 when I find I'm spending minutes for each productive but minor edit. (100 is a completely arbitrary cut-off.) I just realised you probably meant doing the last section first: if so, there's no such disadvantage so please ignore my misguided remark. Certes (talk) 16:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * , I did mean the last section first (I couldn't face 'S' just now), but the advice is appreciated. Leschnei (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Studebaker
No objections and redirected! TY. jengod (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Hinterland
Thank you for adding the blue link to the The Long Dark. I am on mobile, and do not know how to add links to pages. Hope you have a great day.

Ytekai (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. Leschnei (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Leschnei!


Happy New Year! Leschnei, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deniska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denni.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Name lists
Just FYI an article like Marie Louise should not have been assessed as a disambiguation in the first place, those name "disambiguations" are always regarded as list articles and so should be assessed as such. That also means the NA importance should be removed, as it should never be applied to List articles. Except by WP Anthroponymy which is the "home" project for name articles and which is an exception to the rule... Cheers. FlagSteward (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I think that it was made a disambiguation page because there was a section of non-person titles - the ones that I moved to Marie Louise (disambiguation). Those entries made it inappopriate to make Marie Louise a given name page. Leschnei (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Condominium
Hi Leschnei, thanks for your note. No, I'm not an admin so it's not something I can fix. What I have done is sorted out a large number of links that were coming into the dab page which needed redirecting to the various articles. There's still quite a few to go, but I'm going through them slowly. Bermicourt (talk) 14:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks for the quick reply. I'll add Condominium to the malplaced list and try to help with the links. Leschnei (talk) 14:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thank you. Bermicourt (talk) 14:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * - your edit to Condominium has been reverted because Condominium (living space) has been moved to Condominium. I think that you will need to start a proposal if you want to remove 'Condominium' as a primary topic. Leschnei (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Seen that. Thanks. There are some things in Wikipedia that are just not worth the effort... Bermicourt (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Three Busy Debras actually fits the disambiguation page TBD
Dear @Leschnei, the page Three Busy Debras actually fits in the disambiguation page TBD instead of TBA (disambiguation), which I have marked for cleanup. From Bas. From Bassie f (his talk page) 20:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Vinland (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Battle of Vinland (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Joker
Thanks for reverting my addition of Jokic to Joker. I didn't see the nickname list entry, and probably didn't look further having seen the existing nickname-like entries at Joker. Best. —Bagumba (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Your welcome - it's an easy mistake to make. Leschnei (talk) 12:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

JTL (disambiguation)
Well, "thanks" so much for reverting / deleting / trashing my entries to the JTL (disambiguation) article:

I have addressed each of your questions below:

1. WHY did you also revert / delete my additions to the already existing first list item, "jtL, a Korean boy band", detailing that it's "a South Korean boy band", which was absolutely correct?
 * You are right, I shouldn't have removed 'South'. I have returned it.

2. On the article's Talk page, I have explained in detail that I will soon create a coming new article about Jamii Telecommunication Limited, Kenya, which I wanted to link in the JTL (disambiguation) article beforehand. A link that you now deleted. Didn't you read that Talk page? Or is it a MUST that my Wikipedia article exists first before I write a disambiguation entry, a kind of "chicken or the egg" issue? EDIT: Too strange – there's no (more) article Talk page!, where has it gone?
 * Yes, since disambiguation pages help readers find existing articles (or information in other articles), the information should exist in an article before it is listed on a DAB page. I can't see that your discussion was ever added to Talk:JTL or Talk:JTL (disambiguation), and I don't see an edit to either of the talk pages among your contributions. Perhaps you accidentally closed the browser page without saving.

3. WHY do you discuss all this on MY Talk page and NOT on the article's Talk page where it belongs to?
 * MOS:DAB is very clear on external links and topics that aren't mentioned anywhere in Wikipedia. Therefore, it wasn't necessary to start a discussion on the article talk page. I mentioned it on your talk page as an invitation start this further discussion.

4. Following your guidelines mentioned in your contribution to my Talk page: WHY didn't you then also delete the last list entry: "JTL, a charity offering advanced apprenticeships in the building services sector" which isn't linked to Wikipedia at all?
 * I don't know why I missed this - it has been removed.

5. WHY do you revert / delete / trash a user's laborious contribution arbitrarily without first discussing it with him / her, although that is against Wikipedia principles?
 * The removal was not arbitrary - it was according to policy and consistent with other disambiguation pages. I tried to find some mention of Jamii Telecommunication Limited on the pages that you linked, or in any other article, but could not find any. The information that you added to JTL can be retrieved at any time from the history of the page and used in an article.

Kind regards, MFX (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Kudos Leschnei, that's indeed a very fair, cool and helpful statement that I didn't expect, thank you very, very much! – Let's both keep up the good work, and I'll come back here once I've written my JTL article. Tuko pamoja! :-D MFX (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I look forward to reading it. Leschnei (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dennis Rogers (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Dennis Rogers (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Landship (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Landship (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry!
Apologies for breaking WP:BRD on your edits to Let's Kiss and Make Up and Kiss and Make Up. I thought it was an honest mistake on your part since there were a couple moves around the same time, and I had a look through the policy to find something relevant and missed WP:DDAB. Someone else has sorted it out now but it never should have been an issue, my bad! WP scatter t/c 23:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation. It's no problem. Leschnei (talk) 13:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Šokac (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Šokac (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Edelweiss (disambiguation)
Hi, in what way is Bring Me Edelweiss any more (or less) unambiguous than Es war ein Edelweiss, for example?

Nice catch on the double link in the 10th Separate Mountain Assault Brigade entry, btw. I usually try to weed those out myself, but missed that one. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You're right - I should have removed that one too (and now I have). I kept the titles that I thought might be called simply 'Edelweiss'. The song escaped my attention. Thanks for pointing it out. Leschnei (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Christopher Hodson
Please read both the talk page for Christopher Hodson and the discussion on the help desk. By creating Christopher Hodson (disambiguation) you appear to be disagreeing with WP:NOPRIMARY in this instance and asserting that Christopher Hodson, the judge, is the primary topic. Is this so? Please respond either here or, preferably, at Talk:Christopher Hodson. Thanks, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Dugin is harldly used as a surname page
People who end up it on are usually looking for Aleksandr Dugin, but of course there are the other Dugins to what end I tried to make a disambiguation page for it, and I was told that because of the existing page on Dugin I could not do it, why do you disagree? StrongALPHA (talk) 14:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)


 * my edit was simply technical - and mostly described in Name pages. If the page includes only people with the surname, it should be either be a DAB page labelled ' ', or it should be a surname page, labelled '  ' but not 'Category:Human name disambiguation pages' or any other disambiguation category. Also, it is typical for surname pages to include both information about the surname and a list of people. So people looking for another Dugin can use a surname page as readily as a disambiguation page.


 * There is a lot of overlap between these types of pages and a whole range of opinions about their different functions. For pages like Dugin, I mostly don't worry about whether it is a surname page or a DAB page, but just try to make it correct for the type of page that it is. Leschnei (talk) 00:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

You've removed my entry for XACT, why?
I'm into some audio conversion tools and seen somwhere mentioned xACT. I didn't know what is it and so first thing I've done was to type "wiki xACT" and have not found any information so I used google and found this: http://xact.scottcbrown.org ... I don't know how to add references to an article where there are not any (so I can't copy "syntax"). So before you revert anyone's work, look elsewhere. I mentioned this tool probably for the first time at wikipedia so it is not possible to have an already existing article. That also applies to the other meanings for XACT mentined in the wiki article, don't you think?

"xACT (X Audio Compression Toolkit), an application that encodes and decodes FLAC, SHN, Monkey’s Audio, TTA, Wavpack, and Apple Lossless files." k.eight.a 01:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by K.eight.a (talk • contribs)
 * Please read my reply at Talk:XACT. Leschnei (talk) 11:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)