User talk:Leshalfhill

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns about my edits, contact me here.

Regards,

leshalfhill

critiscism of the bible
Hi,

I looked at your edit. I don't know enough to know if either version was correct - but its good that you're bold. One thing that doesn't seem to flow well is to say that it has "some basis in fact" but that cities don't show signs of destruction, or whatever. I'm not familiar with it, so I don't know what the significance of that is. Perhaps you fix it up a bit so that it says something like "contrary to the exodus" or "consistant with the exodus" to note which or what is preported fact and which is thought to be myth. Fresheneesz 04:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, its customary to sign your name with four tildes ( ~ ). That way people know who you are and when you posted. Thanks. Fresheneesz 04:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Adding the "not" seems like it cleared up that part pretty well. Its now consistant. Good edit. Fresheneesz 20:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gusty003.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gusty003.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 15:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)