User talk:Leslieevarts

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Jdfoote 15:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas:
Your recent edit to List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

'DO NOT REMOVE TAGS'
User talk:Leslieevarts Do not remov the tags. If you are in Disagreement place a “Hangon” on the article. But do not remove the tags. Shoessss 22:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The article Vegas Wedding Chapel has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 12:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Vegas wedding chapel
Please see my comments there about spam and speedily deleted articles. Thank you, ...adam...  ( talk &bull;  contributions ) 18:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've moved Talk:Vegas wedding chapel to User talk:Leslieevarts/Vegas wedding chapel so as to preserve the discussion for your later use. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 16:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Submission
Please see your AfC, if you click edit I left a few comments that should help you :) Charmlet (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings


Hello Leslieevarts. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vegas Weddings".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Alexf(talk) 12:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vegas Weddings


Hello Leslieevarts. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vegas Weddings".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Help me
I just removed any content that could be perceived as promotional from the following page and fixed a missing reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Melpon/sandbox/Chapel_of_Vegas_Weddings Now how do I submit the page for review? Can you review it? Any advise in much appreciated. Thank you.
 * You can submit the page for review by adding the code to the top of the page. However, in its present state, it will not pass. The article contains no sources that provide significant coverage of the company - the only one that could be construed as more than a passing mention is the Las Vegas Sun, and that is a press release (and therefore not an independent source). Without significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources, we cannot host an article on the Chapel. Yunshui 雲 水  09:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:VegasWeddingChapel.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:VegasWeddingChapel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)