User talk:LesterLurkin

Welcome!
Hi LesterLurkin! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- 🐦DrWho42  👻  06:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Nirode Mazumdar, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Cherbo Geeplay moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cherbo Geeplay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 10:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherbo Geeplay (September 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cherbo Geeplay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cherbo_Geeplay Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cherbo_Geeplay reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello LesterLurkin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LesterLurkin. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie, this isn't a paid edit at all. The edits were made merely because the earlier drafts either had incorrect or incomplete information, which the edits have attempted to remedy. LesterLurkin (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Why, then, are you filling the article with promotional writing? That is not how an encyclopedia is written. MrOllie (talk) 12:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi MrOllie, I'm not entirely sure which part of the article is promotional writing. I've edited the entry considerably and mentioned only career achievements--which is something that the entries of other civil servants also include. I can edit this further to remove those bits as well, but really, none of this seems "promotional". And admittedly, none of the information I have added is very different from the language used in the current version of the entry; in fact, much of what the live version of the entry says could also be construed as promotional.
 * Also, is there any way to not reject all the changes? The information in the bio box on the top right currently has factually incorrect information and I imagine none of that uses promotional language deemed worthy of a rejection. LesterLurkin (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you can read even a line of this version and not notice any promotional writing, I don't know what to tell you. It is obvious and omnipresent. That is why all the changes had to be reverted. - MrOllie (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * "His positions within the Tamil Nadu Government include CMD, Tamil Nadu Cements, Special Secretary (Finance), and Distt. Magistrate, Villupuram." How is this promotional? It is merely a stating of facts.
 * Or this: "Gupta joined the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) in 1981 and has since served in various posts in both the Union and Tamil Nadu Governments as well as in Central and State Public Sector Units."
 * From the live version, this could easily be promotional as well: "In the wake of efforts to regulate large technology companies in China, the United States, and the European Union, Gupta has advocated for India to take a similar approach towards "Big Tech"."
 * Do please tell me, since you have a clearer idea of what construes promotional writing and I would like to understand it myself to edit this and future entries accordingly. In this case, I don't know how mentioning policy changes implemented under an individual's tenure is promotional per se, but that does seem to be the basis upon which the article was rejected. Should we completely avoid mentioning policy changes/achievements? LesterLurkin (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Who is included in the 'we' you are referring to? MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I meant "we" as a generic entity: we as in anyone who ever edits Wikipedia, especially biographical entries.
 * Please address my queries? LesterLurkin (talk) 04:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've edited the page further--removed all information except that which is strictly factual. I personally don't think the article reflects any bias, since it mainly consists of dates and prior designations, but please review. Thanks. LesterLurkin (talk) 05:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cherbo Geeplay has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cherbo Geeplay. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 07:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for your comment! I've updated the draft according to the instructions on the page linked in your comment but I'm unsure if the changes are reflecting, and also whether the draft is still in consideration for publication. Let me know! LesterLurkin (talk) 10:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherbo Geeplay (January 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cherbo Geeplay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cherbo_Geeplay Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cherbo_Geeplay reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 10:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cherbo Geeplay
Hello, LesterLurkin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cherbo Geeplay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)