User talk:LetsGetItRight2

Welcome!
Hello, LetsGetItRight2, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Zero-energy building, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Julietdeltalima for welcoming me and the useful information provided. I will plan to draft any future revision before submission, and then ask you or another editor to proofread it. I don't feel there is a conflict of interest stating the fact (with citation) that PCD Engineering contributed to the subject project. It appears in rejecting the edit you also removed information that was previously verified and accepted, so I would ask to please restore that information stating Doerr Architecture and Ecofutures Building's contributions to the project. All that was added was the fact that PCD Engineering also contributed to this project which is verifiable information. Thank you. LetsGetItRight2 (talk) 18:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You should answer the question of whether or not you have a connection with Doerr. That's what might constitute a conflict of interest as Wikipedia sees it.
 * I'm not sure went far enough. Since when do we cite a book by the designer and a study by the design firm as reliable sources about a house they designed? Better references, from secondary sources, are needed or else this passage simply becomes REFSPAM or UNDUE.  — jmcgnh (talk)  (contribs) 20:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I have no connection with Doerr. Here is another secondary source reference for the project https://netzeromax.com/case-study-a-net-zero-energy-house/. Shall I resubmit a draft for review with this citation? Thanks 63.227.59.190 (talk) 21:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That site appears to simply be an aggregator with a summary from the Doerr site, which is where it sends you if you click on the 'more details' link. It doesn't appear to be an independent secondary source.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)