User talk:Letterbuyer123

Shaquille O'Neal
I would respectfully request that you please stop adding that "Marc Smilen of Dania, Florida, reports nonsense rumor that no one but Marc Smilen of Dania, Florida, appears to have ever even heard of is false" line to the Shaquille O'Neal article. With all due respect, it is honestly not a positive contribution to the article. Mwelch 21:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Given your other edit history, you don't seem to be an intentional vandal, so I'm assuming good faith on your part, and I'll reach out to you again. I would respectfully ask that you please stop adding that line.  Once again, I'm assuming you're doing it in good faith, but it is still not a positive contribution to use article space to debunk a rumor that 1) no one but you have ever heard of, and 2) doesn't even make any sense in the first place.


 * Additinally, not meaning to be disrespectful, but even if this supposed rumor was plausible, was widespread, and did need debunking, you (Marc Smilen) are not in a position to present yourself as an authority on its veracity. You are not a reputable source on this matter in the Wikipedia sense.


 * So once again, I would like to kindly ask you to please stop putting that statement in the article.


 * Thank you. Mwelch 20:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Practical joke
Stop adding jokes to this article, Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate list. John Reaves (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Unsourced POV edits. Morenooso 15:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Morenooso 23:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Do not include memos to other users: listening is not a source. Morenooso 12:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read the first message I sent you on how to cite reliable sources. See citing and reliable source. Morenooso 12:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Morenooso 12:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. - Rklawton 12:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)