User talk:Letterhead330

December 2015
Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bosnian pyramid claims, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --allthefoxes (Talk) 16:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bosnian pyramid claims has been reverted. Your edit here to Bosnian pyramid claims was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWRj5OZxHcSHeAUhqxYW6Wg, https://www.youtube.com/user/BosnianPyramidsTV) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

LaViolette
I can't help but wonder why you think he got an "accolade" letter from Obama. Anyway, your edit failed WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Writers about UFOs and anti-gravity aren't good sources for archaeology, and Osmanagic's doctorate is in the social sciences and is a pretty poor dissertation as well. Doug Weller (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

add== December 2015 == Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Doug_Weller. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Letterhead330, we are still at the friendly advice stage. Please stop your disruption now, because the next warning will carry the information about the risk of your account being blocked. Thank you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I'll just add that I am nit involved in your article edits and I am not interested in your content dispute. I am concerned with your continued comments about our editors and your attitude towards them. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Whisperback
11:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)