User talk:Lettuce124/Choose an Article

Sourcing heads up
Hi there, one of our sourcing tools identified some sources in your sandbox draft that don't meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources. In this case Genetic description of Manania handi and Manania gwilliami is a preprint, which does not meet Wikipedia sourcing requirements. Preprints need to be published to be considered a reliable source. Additionally "Prolific Origination of Eyes in Cnidaria With Co-Option of Non-Visual Opsins," and "Checklist of the First Recorded Spider Fauna in Sheringal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan" are not yet reliable sources. I would recommend removing them and finding other sources to build your article. It's not always easy to tell what a good sources vs what isn't. If you want a refresher on reliable sources, you may recall that the Evaluating articles training module discusses examples of what is a good source and what isn't. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. Will (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)