User talk:Lev Lafayette

License tagging for File:Cover of firmin novel by Sam Savage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of firmin novel by Sam Savage.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm JQTriple7. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Andragogy with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JQ Triple7  talk  07:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Your recent edit to List of secularist organizations appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Could you stop being like this please? Just because an organisation doesn't have a Wikipedia page it's doesn't mean that it is any less significant that the one's already listed. You are damaging the usefulness of the list. Stop it. Lev Lafayette (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm just following Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is not a directory. Adding "Inc." doesn't do a thing to change that. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, based on a quick Google search, it appears that you are affiliated with this organization in some way. I would suggest also reviewing Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Which is why I am not actually writing an article, just adding an appropriate link to one of the country's more active secular organisations. I'm mean really, what are you trying to do? Reduce the usefulness and appropriateness of the page? Lev Lafayette (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have searched repeatedly for any reliable sources which establish the notability of this organization. I can find none. I am trying to increase the usefulness and reliability of the page by reducing spam links and non-notable information. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Try the Victorian parliament. Or other similar organisations in the state (Humanists Society of Victoria, Rationalists Society of Victoria, Melbourne Atheist Society). Lev Lafayette (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you could have checked the Wikipedia article that the entry was linked to? That would actually be helpful, you know.Lev Lafayette (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)