User talk:Levan Gavasheli

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fermat's Great Theorem (November 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Fermat%27s_Great_Theorem Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fermat%27s_Great_Theorem reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and original research

 * 1) If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. One of the main reasons for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way.
 * 2) Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing original research. Wikipedia policy is that we have only material which has already received substantial coverage in multiple reliable published sources.
 * 3) Promotional material of any kind is not acceptable. That includes promotion of oneself or one's own work. JBW (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter. In my message above I referred to what you had posted as original "research", but whatever you choose to call it, Wikipedia is not the place to try to publicise it. If you think that what you have written has some mathematical merit then you may like to try to get it published in a reputable academic journal, not something put out by a predatory publisher. If you do manage to get it published in a reputable academic journal, and if it then receives significant attention in reliable publications, then it will be suitable to become the topic of a Wikipedia article, and some independent third party will no doubt write such an article. Unless and until that happens, it is not suitable for Wikipedia JBW (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Draft:Fermat's Great Theorem. Pinging as this user keeps recreating the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are  not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you would like to start making constructive contributions to the encyclopaedia, on subjects other than yourself, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason" with appropriate text. ''Note: You are still able to edit this page so that you can post an unblock request if you wish to. If you misuse this talk page by posting inappropriate material again, as you have recently done, your ability to edit this page will be removed.''

JBW (talk) 09:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Понимаете ли вы, что то, что вы сделали, было неприемлемо для этого сайта, и можем ли мы получить от вас гарантию, что вы не будете делать это снова?» Да Levan Gavasheli (talk) 11:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Нет, я этого не понимаю. JBW (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)