User talk:LeverageNetworks

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  20:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If unblocked, do you agree to stop attempting to create articles about non-notables companies that you are affiliated with? OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

– I can't figure out how to edit this. I am not adding any articles at all as far as I am aware. All I am trying to do is update broken links on references that lead to our site. Pegasus Communications, the single most prominent publisher in the field of Systems Thinking, is now Leverage Networks. And our Google Analytics shows that the links that others have put in Wikipedia are going to dead links generating 404s. I am trying to fix those and add in missing links from publications.LeverageNetworks (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is not "updating" links; it's adding links to a site selling books, which violates WP:ELNO. You won't be unblocked if you intend to continue spamming links to a company you are affiliated with.OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * A successful unblock will be dependen on very explicit and satisfactory comments answering the point raised by ohnoitsjamie. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)