User talk:Levrese

February 2023
Hello Levrese. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Levrese. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CNMall41 (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear CNMall41,
 * Kindly note that this is my first time using Wikipedia. It is also worth mentioning that I have not been paid by any entity to write or edit this page, in contrast, this is my private business that I am about to launch, and I just wanted to make it evident to the whole world in an encyclopedic form that is liable to editing by any Wikipedia editor. It was not meant to be an advertisement in any form, but rather an encyclopedia.
 * Thanks, Levrese (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You do not have to be paid directly to fall under WP:PAID. You will need to read the guideline and make the appropriate disclosure. I would also recommend changing your username as it gives the impression it is being operated by a company rather than an individual. Also keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a medium for you to promote your company or to make it "evident to the whole world." --CNMall41 (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. You are correct that according to Wikipedia's policy on paid editing, individuals who receive compensation, directly or indirectly, for editing Wikipedia articles must disclose their paid status. I appreciate the reminder and I will make sure to follow the appropriate guidelines and make any necessary disclosures.
 * I also appreciate your suggestion to change my username to avoid any confusion about my status as an individual editor rather than a company. I will consider changing my username to better reflect my individual identity.
 * Lastly, I understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting companies or products. I assure you that I have no intention of using Wikipedia for such purposes. My goal is to contribute accurate and unbiased information to the platform for the benefit of the community. I would like to know if my page is deleted forever, or if I can re-write the entire article and publish it again for review.
 * Thank you again for your message and for your commitment to upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Levrese (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You said "appreciate the reminder." This gives me the impression that this is not the first time editing Wikipedia. The draft you submitted was also similar to drafts written by people hired to write them. What other accounts have you used to edit Wikipedia in the past? --CNMall41 (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for any confusion my previous message may have caused. I understand that my use of the phrase "appreciate the reminder" may have given you the impression that I have prior experience with Wikipedia editing, but I assure you that this is my first time using the platform.
 * As for the similarity of my draft to those written by professional writers, I can understand how it may appear that way. However, I can assure you that I have not hired anyone to write the draft for me or copied content from any other source. I have simply tried to do thorough research on Wikipedia writing and present the information in a clear and concise manner.
 * I'm new to the platform, and I'm still learning about its policies and guidelines. If you have any suggestions or feedback, I would be happy to hear them. I'm committed to making accurate and valuable contributions to Wikipedia, and I'm willing to work with the community to ensure that my contributions meet the platform's standards. Levrese (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levrese (February 18)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Levrese Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Likely UPE based on username. Promotional draft without any references.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Levrese


A tag has been placed on Draft:Levrese, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CNMall41 (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)