User talk:Lewelk

Hanson Medical
You appear to be a Single Purpose Account for this article, and your edits continue to make that article promotional. Wikipedia has a core policy of a Neutral Point of View WP:NPOV. EBY (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

I was simply trying to update the page to accurately capture the updated technology. It may come across as promotional because I referenced, the company's website for information about descriptions on their product.


 * A company's own website is generally not considered a reliable source for a Wikipedia article and is NEVER to be used as the primary source for an article (see WP:RELIABLE). What is needed is 3rd party sources that write about the company, those are the best source for what is notable and verifiable.EBY (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Gotcha. I'll look for other sources for product descriptions. I agree that 3rd part sources are the best, but for FDA cleared products, the company's website is so highly regulated that their product descriptions are quite reliable. I've often seen news sources report on medical devices and inaccurately state the approved indications for the product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.215.83.240 (talk) 23:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)