User talk:Lewis UNESCO SC

June 2021
Hello Lewis UNESCO SC. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lewis UNESCO SC. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear Cordless Larry,

Thank you for flagging this issue.

I am employed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

I am being compensated for my work on the UNESCO Science Report, which is a not-for-profit open access publication (CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO), freely available for download online.

My job is not to promote UNESCO but to disseminate the findings of the report - to improve the store of knowledge on science, technology and innovation around the world.

The report itself is written by a team of 70 independent experts.

I shall post the mandatory disclosure on my user page. Please could you provide some guidance as to how I should proceed?

With thanks and regards,

Jake
 * Thank you. There are instructions in my message above (to use at  User:Lewis UNESCO SC) and further guidance at Paid-contribution disclosure. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Science and technology in Panama moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Science and technology in Panama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Science and technology in Panama
Hello, Lewis UNESCO SC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Science and technology in Panama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)